regulations around fishing menhaden
The lecturer presents information concerning the proposed rules and regulations around fishing menhaden. While the article presents the argument that a ban on fishing menhaden is not a solution, the lecturer strongly disagrees and presents ideas refuting the reading.
First of all, the reading says the number of menhaden is falling because they are prey to striped bass. However, the lecturer explains that natural predators are a vital part of every ecosystem maintaining a natural balance. New rules will allow for this balance to be better monitored, and allow for a return to normal levels of fish in the waters.
Next the reading suggests that menhaden should not be banned from fishing because they are a vital source of food for livestock. The lecturer refutes this idea by suggesting that there are alternative sources of food. Given that menhaden are not the only source of food for livestock, new rules would not interfere with livestock production.
Finally, the reading brings up the point that fishermen will suffer because of fishing bans. While the lecturer acknowledges this as true, he beings up the point that this ban will be short-lived, and then the fishermen may be able to return to fishing menhaden with new regulations. He also proposes a switch in the type of fish they seek as a means of alternative income.
All in all, the lecturer provides alternative reasons for why a fishing ban would be good for menhaden. It would help rebalance the natural structure of the food chain. In the process farmers would have to find alternative feed, and the fishermen would have to seek out a different fish, but none of this is insurmountable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-06 | xiao | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-06 | Allenwlh | 90 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | Oli_ve | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- social media 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Dancing plays an important role in a culture Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For students who are planning to work in business learning about psychology is more important than learning about technology Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Practice and hard work are more important to an athlete s success than natural ability and talent Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- The article and the lecture focus on the problem of building wildlife crossings 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, then, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05035971223 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69801438296 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489208633094 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2439679535 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.285714286 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284723056846 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105159082507 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120340270979 0.0662205650399 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166642962562 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106667764651 0.0443174109184 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.