Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "A person should never make an important decision alone."
People are social beings as it was correctly stated by Aristotle philosopher. Humans should interact with each other and through this process to balance themselves. I definitely believe in the power of communication and discussion between people and I think it is the best way that someone should always use when he is called to make an important decision. Some of the most important reasons supporting the claim that a person should never make a crucial decision alone would be discussed below.
First of all, when a person has to make a really important decision for his life, it is mathematically assured that he will be under a high pressure and stress conditions. Under the control of these factors, the individual is not able to think objectively and with a critical mind and he would most probably do wrong steps based exclusively on emotions. Therefore, a discussion with people that he trusts will help him to keep his self-control and feel support from his surroundings. Thus mistaken decisions could be avoided.
Furthermore, the discussion about a crucial topic that requires a decision making would enlighten some sides of the topic that the individual had not previously considered by himself. Through this process, the advantages and drawbacks of a particular decision would be revealed and the potential results would be evaluated more completed. Two minds are always better and more effective than one. It is impossible for someone to know everything and always to be correct. Thus, a discussion with another person would have contributed to a more mature and true conclusion related to the decision.
To sum up, taking into account all things have been spoken above it could be concluded that a person should always seek advice and different assessments made by his trustable ones for an important decision so a better choice could be done.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
People are social beings as it was corre...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sion alone would be discussed below. First of all, when a person has to make ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mistaken decisions could be avoided. Furthermore, the discussion about a cruc...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... conclusion related to the decision. To sum up, taking into account all thing...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, really, so, therefore, thus, as to, i think, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09120521173 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84184733899 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560260586319 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.530288071 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.642857143 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181171859471 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630588668527 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541407298354 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118844198883 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494081741856 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.