Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
"A person should never make an important decision alone."
We make decisions every day, whether they are of great or small significance, these decisions produce consequences that we must, inevitably, face. While some people prefer to make important decisions on their own, I am convinced that having a counselor while you make such decisions is more advantageous. I feel this way for the reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, making decisions with a partner will make it easier and more efficient to find the best solutions. We all have the tendency to judge from one perspective, which narrows down the number of solutions we can find. Nevertheless, the decision we may make on our own may be the wrong one. In such a case, we would have no choice but to confront the consequences. However, we are not aware of this matter. In contrast, sharing our responsibility in decision-making with a friend we trust, a member of our family, or a counselor of our choice will expose us to different perspectives. If our proposed solution is disadvantageous, a second pair has a greater probability to notice it. Additionally, if we haven’t come to a singular decision, our partners can advise us based on their experience. In brief words, having a partner while we make decisions of great importance is more beneficial than compared to making decisions alone.
Furthermore, even vocalizing our problems and the decisions that we ought to make can help us in decision-making. More specifically, it has been scientifically proven that when stating our decisions out loud, we become aware of the mistakes or loopholes in our suggested decisions. As such, if we discuss our suggestions with our trusted companions, even in the case where our friend cannot advise us, we can find the best solution throughout the conversation. One experience of mine proves evidence of this. When I was a sophomore in high school, I wasn’t sure whether to inform my professor regarding an academic issue. Therefore, I chose to consult with a classmate first. He didn’t have a solution for me, however, when I expressed my suggestion, I found the mistakes in my proposal. Being exposed to those mistakes helped me make the best solution, because I chose to do the exact opposite of my initial proposal. As such, I didn’t face the possible adverse consequences.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that it is better to take important decisions with a partner for the reasons mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will explore in the following essay. To begin with, making decisions with a p...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n compared to making decisions alone. Furthermore, even vocalizing our problem...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce the possible adverse consequences. In conclusion, I firmly believe that it ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, while, i feel, in brief, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02205882353 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16730306086 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536764705882 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2845509013 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1363636364 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13636363636 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211430891764 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656694991915 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538089565068 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139492885514 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217844589187 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.