The advent of new technologies has great impact on our lives. One of the most inventions influencing our lives is the internet. It is undeniable that internet helps us in our daily lives. Meanwhile, there is rising debate over whether professors should ban students from using devices with internet connection or not. Both views have supporters, and when it comes to me, I believe such a prohibition can be helpful for students. I have some reasons to support my opinion two of which will be explored in this essay.
First of all, although the internet contains a lot of helpful information, it can be a distraction during class. What a student should do in class is to pay full attention to his professor. Having devices connected to the internet can adversely affect the students concentration. Nowadays, in all mobile phones, for example, there are some applications which are fascinating enough too bring attention to the social media instead of classes. As soon as you enter these applications, it will be hard to leave them; and considerable time of the class will be wasted. I can remember when I was a teacher assistat, I had a class in which it was free to use any kind of devices. Unfortunately, the class was not efficient at all, because most students used there mobiles time to time and they not only distract me from doing my job but also distract themselves from listening to what goes on in class.
Besides that, I firmly believe that by searching web about our academic topics, variety of noteworthy contents will show up. The fact that the internet is great source is undeniable; but this kind of web-surfing should be done after the class. During the class time, students must concentrate on professor’s lecture. Maybe that lecture could not be replaced by any other sources in the internet or at least it is too difficult to exploit such a lecture from the internet pages. Once I had this kind of distraction during one of my important classes. I obliged to search the web to redeem what I missed in class but I could not find any proper information. Despite allocating much time, I had to go to library to find what I easily could listen in class. It was poor a attempt too; and finally I went to my professor’s office to get help. If I listen carefully in class, I would not waste my time and energy for such a thing.
In conclusion, I believe having been connected to world wide web is a boon, but it should be designated to proper time and proper locations. Wasting class time for web-surfing will lead to a deep regret in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...o the internet can adversely affect the students concentration Nowadays in all mobile ph...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to bring'?
Suggestion: to bring
...plications which are fascinating enough too bring attention to the social media instead o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 753, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...asily could listen in class It was poor a attempt too and finally I went to my pr...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, if, may, so, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55408388521 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63069276438 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467991169978 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 453.0 20.1344086022 2250% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2063.0 100.406767564 2055% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 453.0 20.6045352989 2199% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 115.0 5.45110844103 2110% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262102486962 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.262102486962 0.076458572812 343% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156739500118 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659795567813 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 226.5 11.7677419355 1925% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -379.86 58.1214874552 -654% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 178.8 10.1575268817 1760% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.59 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 29.03 8.01818996416 362% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 10.002688172 550% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 183.2 10.0537634409 1822% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 10.247311828 537% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.