Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
professor should prohibit the use of devices that can connect to internet in class
No one can cast shadow on this fact that in modern era technology play a dominant role in human being life. Throughout history, as the technology field evolved, there has been a heated yet confusing debate among the academicians whether professors should prohibit devices that can connect to internet to internet in classes. While many are adamant that this subject is more fruitful, others hold exactly the opposite perspective. From my vantage point, student should have their devices such as smartphones even in class.
First and the foremost reason to substantiate my stand point is that using devices which can connect to internet can be assumed as training added tools. Take personal experience as an example. In one of my English classes, the place where everybody with different education are there, we discuss about various subjects and share different information with each other. Sometimes there has been some debates which there is no consensus on it. What should we do if we didn’t have internet in our smartphones? How we can get agreed on our subject? Is it possible to continue our discussion without any query? Absolutely not. We should achieve cardinal information from somewhere. Where is more advantageous of internet?
Another reason that deserve some attention is that one can present related examples during a class. Let me take a history class as an example. A class which professor talk about identified tribe and explain about their features. How internet can help the class? By presenting related examples. It is axiomatic that class with one lecturer is utterly futile effort and will be exhaustive at the end. When student collaborate in training they co-operate the class context so, students can remember all discussed essential information easily. Indeed, students can flower their potential abilities such as lecturing, presenting, etc. as well.
Furthermore, we live in technology era. Life without technology is meaningless for modern human. Although there are some perspective against using internet in class, they just delineate vague silhouette of the reality and are not cognizant of myriad benefits involved in it. Tangible results and statistics, drawn from an exhaustive psychological survey conducted by university of Tehran indicate that human beings lives are more dependent on technology rather than before. Results show that people can’t imagine a day without internet. They acclaim that half of their needs fixed with internet.
Reflecting upon all aforementioned reasons, one can soon realize that using internet can be beneficial for students. Despite of all demerits of internet it can be used as a singular tool for gaining information, extra examples, etc. I’m of the opinion that because of internet accessible information everybody especially students should using it as much as they can.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to internet'.
Suggestion: to internet
...hould prohibit devices that can connect to internet to internet in classes. While many are adamant that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing a class. Let me take a history class as an example. A class which professor t...
^^
Line 6, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from an exhaustive psychological survey conducted by university of Tehran indica...
^^
Line 6, column 582, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs fixed" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'fixing' or 'to be fixed'.
Suggestion: fixing; to be fixed
.... They acclaim that half of their needs fixed with internet. Reflecting upon all a...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat using internet can be beneficial for students. Despite of all demerits of int...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2424.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3986636971 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8139287216 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572383073497 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 770.4 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.2755862092 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9666666667 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.6 5.45110844103 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.88709677419 327% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318405342589 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715611042932 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679788757805 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176084397685 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387366662655 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.