Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the modern era, the necessity of having access to internet services has raised a lot of debate among academicians. Some may take the opinion that the benefits of providing extensive access to the internet cannot outweigh its disadvantages for a plethora of reasons. However, others may hold the opposite viewpoint and believe that nowadays the internet seems like a great highway and the lives of many people depend on having access to convenient and affordable internet services. I personally incline towards the latter opinion. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through some notable reasons.
My first reason and maybe the most important one is that as I have mentioned, many businesses and financial activities today rely on the internet on an incredible scale. Therefore, their success or failure can be determined based on their accessibility to fast and cheap internet services. In contrast to the past, many modern-day companies advertise on the internet and their decision-makers have exerted great attempts to draw people's attention via social media and advertisements spread on the website pages. Many people also endeavor to meet their requirements by searching on the internet since this way, they are able to save a great deal of time and energy. They prefer to shop on online websites instead of driving their cars, finding an empty parking lot, and then shopping around in the shopping centers, which is very time-consuming and inconvenient. Not only does online shopping cost people less time, but also it gives them the opportunity to enjoy discounts offered on online websites which try to attract more and more consumers.
My second reason is that the growth of scientific research depends on the internet to a large extent. Today, many researchers and scientists publish their papers on the website journals instead of printing them on the printed magazines. Hence, if the government wants to guarantee a great level of science production, it entails providing suitable and cheap access to the internet for the scientific community. This way, they have the opportunity to keep up with their counterparts in other countries. We all know how fast science is developed today and it will be very awkward to compensate in the future if we cannot catch up today.
Lastly, I think the internet has appeared to be an enjoyable form of entertainment for a broad range of people. Many people would rather spend their leisure time surfing the internet or playing online games instead of going out. This may cause many problems for both society and individuals. However, from my point of view, it is a matter of personal preference to determine which kind we want to spend our time, and we should have access to all of the possible solutions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'takes'.
Suggestion: takes
... of debate among academicians. Some may take the opinion that the benefits of provid...
^^^^
Line 4, column 442, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... our time, and we should have access to all of the possible solutions.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, lastly, may, second, so, then, therefore, i think, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2329.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08515283843 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81174305553 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53711790393 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9941219729 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.45 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218046900287 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665880773058 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466167549306 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136055755014 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300406134 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.