Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Nowadays supervisors and professors use different ways to assign classroom or work tasks to employees or students. Some of them prefer to communicate about a project in person. However, others may take the opposite viewpoint and believe that convey messages indirectly is a much better way in order to save time. Everyone has a special goal in their mind, which encourages them to behave in the way they consider more reasonable. Thus, I cannot explain all the motives people have behind their decision. I personally prefer to communicate directly with people when I want to discuss a subject and assign a project. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through some notable reasons.
My first reason and maybe the most important one is that always communicating directly with colleagues and students is a better way to convey thoughts, ideas, and expectations. Not only does it give people the opportunity to talk with their supervisor easily and report their difficulties in time, but it also provides a great environment to solve misconceptions and potential mistakes. Sometimes students or employees interpret a sentence in an e-mail different from the meaning writer had in their mind, which leads the readers to follow the wrong path and waste a lot of time, energy, and even financial resources.
My second reason is that many people do not check their e-mails regularly, and they may read them once a week or even later. That's why sending e-mail is not always the most trustworthy and reliable strategy to keep in touch with other people. Some people also ignore some information written in an e-mail and do not read the whole idea presented. It indeed depends on the mood of readers and the time of the day they scroll up their e-mails and check them. In addition, mail systems sometimes have flaws, which interfere with sending e-mail appropriately without informing the one who wrote the e-mail. Such events may cause many avoidable conflicts between people who do not easily understand the problem.
Lastly, this way, managers and professors have the opportunity to talk gently with people and form a warm and friendly atmosphere, which may be helpful in inculcating team spirit in others. The mutual trust and sense of respect established between employees and their boss, or student and their professors, may lead to a sense of responsibility that cannot be achieved in other forms of communication. If I use my sense of humor, for example, in a serious meeting, my colleagues tend to give a lot of consideration to their tasks because they regard me as a trustworthy person who is willing to help and care about them in difficult situations. They don't afraid of my attitudes anymore since they are cognizant of the fact that I am their friends, not their rivals.
In summary, based on the aforementioned arguments, there is a myriad of reasons that convince me to support the idea of communicating directly with my colleagues or students. Some of them, such as solving probable mistakes and problems, having the opportunity to convey the whole idea of a project, and forming a friendly relationship, are mentioned above. However, that was like a story in a nutshell. Actually, there are other reasons and ideas challenging this claim, which are not mentioned above. All in all, I firmly believe that communicating directly with people always provides the most benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ay read them once a week or even later. Thats why sending e-mail is not always the mo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 650, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...bout them in difficult situations. They dont afraid of my attitudes anymore since th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, lastly, may, second, so, thus, for example, in addition, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 13.8261648746 231% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2846.0 1977.66487455 144% => OK
No of words: 566.0 407.700716846 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02826855124 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87757670434 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85264954201 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492932862191 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 889.2 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6253271176 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.84 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.64 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209239763023 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610085697026 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590005371814 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116132848629 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414822707111 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.