Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Rich people who do not work will be happy.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Rich people who do not work will be happy.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In my opinion, rich people not working is unhappy. Not being rich, I can’t fathom the lifestyle and mindset of a millionaire. Nonetheless, I believe that wealthy people will not be happy if they do not work.
First, true happiness stems from self-actualization, and working is arguably the most profound way toward achieving this. In the hierarchy of needs proposed by Maslow, self-actualization is at the top of the pyramid. While some needs, such as food and security, may be achieved by wealth, the highest one requires a commitment through working. Working is a way of making full use of our inner potential, and by working, we can chase after our dream of a lifetime. We are giving through working, and by working, we feel that we are needed, and thus a sense of achievement arises, making us feel happy. Conversely, if we are not working, we are receiving. Though we can acquire a cornucopia of food and comfort with considerable wealth, emptiness will drown our hearts.
Second, the process of chasing after a dream, not the result of achieving a goal, is the source of fulfillment. If we lead an affluent life, it is likely that we already have everything we want. On the surface, we have nothing to worry about. However, human desire is infinite. When we have a lot, we want more, and what we have is always not enough to fulfill our appetite. On the contrary, if we have few possessions at hand, we will feel gratified if we make a little progress toward our dream through working. Thus, we will be proud of ourselves for what we have done every day and thus lead a fulfilling life.
In sum, work is vital to our well-being. Without work, even rich people will sense that something is missing and feel unhappy.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs proposed" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'proposing' or 'to be proposed'.
Suggestion: proposing; to be proposed
...hieving this. In the hierarchy of needs proposed by Maslow, self-actualization is at the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th, emptiness will drown our hearts. Second, the process of chasing after a d...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...day and thus lead a fulfilling life. In sum, work is vital to our well-being....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, thus, well, while, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73413897281 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78615703496 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543806646526 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6846945251 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.2272727273 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0454545455 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256969540886 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105835740974 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152927867326 0.0737576698707 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265196954802 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179014921956 0.0645574589148 277% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.56 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs proposed" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'proposing' or 'to be proposed'.
Suggestion: proposing; to be proposed
...hieving this. In the hierarchy of needs proposed by Maslow, self-actualization is at the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th, emptiness will drown our hearts. Second, the process of chasing after a d...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...day and thus lead a fulfilling life. In sum, work is vital to our well-being....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, thus, well, while, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73413897281 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78615703496 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543806646526 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6846945251 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.2272727273 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0454545455 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256969540886 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105835740974 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152927867326 0.0737576698707 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265196954802 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179014921956 0.0645574589148 277% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.56 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.