As societies develop, rules for teens to follow change as well. Whether the rules that communities set for young people is too strict or not has aroused a vibrant debate. Some people could say that young people have much freedom than before when they should obey a large number of limitations in order to fulfill their goals, while others hold the opposite standpoint. Personally, I reckon that with no doubt young people follow stricter rules than before. I feel this way for three main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
At first, young female job seekers are more difficult than males to obtain jobs. It is an undeniable fact that companies nowadays have obvious sexual preference of hiring more male employees, due to male employees' excellent working abilities, which haven’t been confirmed by scientific researches yet. Even inside companies, female employees are impossible to enjoy same rights as males do, which young female workers make more effort to become business elites. What’s worse, great chances are that though the majority of effort are offered, young employees still stay at original positions.
Secondly, rules from families are also strict. Parents almost in a large number, wish their children to be successful. Consequently, young people at the age of which they should play with friends or have a close relationship with nature, now have to face a wealth of homework and shoulder extra studying pressure. For example, an ordinary family would arrange their children to take foreign language class and dancing class in their children's spare time.As a result, most children go to sleep surprisingly late, some even on 12:00 pm. Opposed to satisfying their parents' demands, children are supposed to develop their own interests in order to be a better version of themselves.
At last, no one can escape the judgement by the amount of money you have, which is an invisible rule in societies. Imagine that living in a big city means pay a large amount of money on renting and other life costs. It's likely that we don't have much money saved in bank. In rational sense, simple pleasures have nothing to do with money, which indeed is a belief promoted by a vast majority of young people. However, this belief is unacceptable in today's societies. It is possible that you are treated unequally just because of wearing a pair of inexpensive shoes. What ridiculous!
In conclusion, young people have to face lots of rules which should be removed by the effort of everyone living in communities. Only in this way can young people fulfill their goals easier.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...eedom than before when they should obey a large number of limitations in order to fulfill their g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...and other life cost. Its likely that we dont have much money saved in bank. In ratio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, i reckon, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98944591029 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55840636988 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588390501319 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3429265638 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0476190476 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0476190476 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188854299167 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571596187605 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611640967249 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108516126546 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085401925189 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.