Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can deny that current rules have negative and positive aspects, but if I were forced to decide, I would definitely bias toward the change of rules due to relative strict, I had this feeling for several reasons, which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs:
First of all, the frame of life, in which we live, is very different from the way of life of older peoples. For instance, young people nowadays becoming more and more closer because of the data revolution for this reason these people feel like to create more social ties, like loud parties, this type of event is restricted by government in spite of the importance of such events to healthy relationships for contemporaries young people. I have to admit that I have this belief from my personal experiences, which profoundly influenced my thought, when I was younger I always eager to be close to people, but rules hindered this crave, as a result, I occasionally attempted to gather with my friends secretively.
Secondly, human beings have a natural desire for change throughout history and in every cultural background, yet rules are barely developed, for this reason, young people feel increasingly the pressure from rules. For example when I was studying in my college the vast majority of professors prevented the speak during the lectures even for asking questions, this type of conservative act made it hard for the students to have answers to their questions.
Finally, young people are the building blocks of the future and the rules must be more flexible to let them be more natural and unleash their creativity.
In conclusion, young people have to be allowed by governments to get more flexible rules, and not to obey and follow everything.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eny that current rules have negative and positive aspects, but if i were forced t...
^^
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... negative and positive aspects, but if i were forced to decide, I would definite...
^
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...young people nowadays becoming more and more closer because of the data revolution for this...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e vast majority of professors prevented the speak during the lectures even for asking que...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 291.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94501718213 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74311194587 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591065292096 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 20.6003584229 24% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 58.0 20.1344086022 288% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 215.699420491 48.9658058833 441% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 287.8 100.406767564 287% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 58.2 20.6045352989 282% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 26.8 5.45110844103 492% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124800204628 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079466266125 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403608759536 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815043123287 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365683668571 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.0 11.7677419355 263% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 12.61 58.1214874552 22% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.9 10.1575268817 255% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.32 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.01818996416 133% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 10.002688172 530% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 25.2 10.0537634409 251% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 26.0 10.247311828 254% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.