Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students do not respect teachers as much as they did in the past.
Throughout history, the triumph of the society has been intimately linked to its education system. Therefore, the government has always strived to identify determining factors in its improvement. That students' attitute toward this system and their teachers exerts a significant influence on its effectiveness reigns among psychologists. A controversial question which has always brought about heated debates is whether the students respect the teachers more than in the past. The popular conviction to which I cling is that their respect has increased. In what follows, I am going to cogently vindicate my viewpoint.
The first reason to lend credence to the argument is that the society is contending with unemployment and a severe financial crisis. Therefore, people have always sought a panacea for these maladies. These conditions has led to increases in the importance of the education. In effect, in the past people were fanatically attached to their ancestors' jobs, and their parents paid less heed to the education. However, people have the conviction that education is essential for children. Should they are educated, they will be able to survive these conditions since they will be able to gain the prerequisite knowledge, and earn money. Additionally, establishing connections with teachers is Hobson's choice for them since the teachers can help them deepen their knowledge and may provide them with a job. As an example, I used to work with a prominent professor in my university. I was polite and I respected him a lot. After the graduation, he offered me to work for his company. Had I not respected him, I would not have a decent salary now. However, a few students who did not respect him are asking him to provide job for them. It can be construed that the students are coerced to respect their teachers.
Another equally noteworthy reason is that teachers have improved their pedagogical methods, and by using these effective approaches, their students are more likely to respect them. In the past, teachers used to treat their students inappropriately. They used to establish stringent laws and punished their students physically. However, teachers' awareness has increased over time since the government has provided them with useful classes, and information is more accessible to them. As an example, my father showed me a clip in which his teacher was punishing the students violently. However, a teacher punished a student inappropriately, and its video had a huge reaction on social media. This reaction is eloquent of the fact that teachers' behaviors toward the student has altered significantly.
In conclusion, it is my sincere belief that the students respect the children more than in the past. The students behavior and attitute toward their teachers have a great influence on their learning capacity. It is, therefore, highly recommended that the government direct its efforts toward improving the education system. In this way, benefitting from the students who have sufficient knowledge to expedite the process of improvement of the society would not be far-fetched.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ea for these maladies. These conditions has led to increases in the importance of t...
^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...the children more than in the past. The students behavior and attitute toward their teac...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2616.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 493.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30628803245 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98400378034 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478701825558 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 804.6 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7506954089 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4333333333 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.76666666667 5.45110844103 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200444643287 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568153440916 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454193394584 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131551101649 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301550327984 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.