Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people believe that government should give importance on universities and spend money more here than that of education of young children. However, I disagree with the given statement and think that it is more important to spend government money on primary level education in the 21st-century.
First of all, young children are the future of the nations. The success of the country depends on the skills of today's younger generation. Because they would be the future leader and it is important to provide quality education. For example, in USA, the government focuses on children's educational programs, like installing computer programs for making children more competent and they are more capable to handle future tasks more easily. In contrast, Bangladesh, government spends less amount of money on primary level education, they have no access to computer, projector and they face difficulty to do these types of work in later. Therefore, to make the competent workforce or people, leader, it is obvious to give more attention to the education of young children.
Secondly, young children have good memory and it is the perfect time to form their base. If they understand the basic concepts of the subject, they will able to cope up with the later educational subjects. However, it is not easy to make them understand and concentrate on lessons. As children on this age want to play more rather than study. Hence, educational institutions or teachers need to use different technics to make them learned. For these reasons, the educational institutions need more money to make attracted classroom, provide training to teachers. For instance, while visiting developed countries, I noticed that children classrooms are decorated with educational toys, teachers teach mathematical formula and other basic things while playing. On the other hand, in India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, this scenario is quite rare. There teachers force the young children to learn, and it makes the child reluctant to study and cannot do better in the long run. A recent survey of one of the world's educational programmes has shown that the reasons of doing good of developed countries are that they spend a lot of money for the development of child educational scheme.
In conclusion, it can state that as children are the backbone of a nation, it is important to spend money on their educations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...portance on universities and spend money more here than that of education of youn...
^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... understand and concentrate on lessons. As children on this age want to play more ...
^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nal institutions or teachers need to use different technics to make them learned....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19220779221 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8109320839 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509090909091 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9950366778 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.210526316 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05263157895 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410560051388 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117812392185 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947054764092 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270885579864 0.150856017488 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087084379245 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.