Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. U

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

It is inevitable that education is an important policy for every country because children are the future of the country. Therefore, it raises the question the government should spend the money on the education of very young children or spend money on universities. I hold the belief that the government needs to spend the money on the young generation.

First of all, it can benefit most people by spending the money on the young people because not every citizen is willing to enter the university, but they all need to study in the elementary school. Hence, if the government put the budget on the basic stage, it can help most people. Take my country Taiwan for example. In Taiwan, our government provides the basic education for all citizens, meaning that we all need to study in school for about nine years. Even the students coming from the disadvantaged family also can enter the school to learn the basic acknowledges without paying any money. Therefore, this policy makes Taiwan have the highest literacy rate around the world.

Furthermore, expect the government, no other people or organization will offer the basic educational resources because it cannot make the profit on it. On the contrary, founding the university can make money by attracting many students desiring to have decent jobs in the future to pay the expensive tuition. On the other hands, only the government has the ability to conduct the basic education. Take China for example. At last year, the big earthquake hit China and many elementary schools collapsed. This accident made many people donate the money to build an elementary school to help the students there. At first, it seemed everything fine because the donation kept coming in so the school had enough money to find teachers and buy some fundamental stuffs for running the school. However, the donation decreases now because people start to forget this accident and the school finally shut down, proving that without the government, it is difficult to run the elementary school.

Some may argue that the government needs to put the effort in the university since the university can help students to understand the advanced knowledge, which can lead our country to a brighter future. However, I insist that if we do not cultivate the strong basic knowledge in the elementary school, how can we learn well in the university? Therefore, if the government offer enough basic educational resources, then all students have enough abilities to enter the university, which will make our country stronger.

In conclusion, I take the position that the government needs to spend money on the education of the young people because it not only can benefit more people but also is the task that only government can do.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...ntertainers and athletes privacy become a news. Just as we know, the news' aim is...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...d us. In other words, we do not need so much entertainers privacy on the news. Take ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'entertainers'' or 'entertainer's'?
Suggestion: entertainers'; entertainer's
... In other words, we do not need so much entertainers privacy on the news. Take my country Ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, really, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in other words, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9797752809 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68468892084 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465168539326 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7035012728 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.727272727 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2272727273 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22727272727 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291241851497 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977400273869 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979196007106 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204688664006 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908410604523 0.0645574589148 141% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.