Your friends have the opportunity to choose either one of two types of majors (fields of study), which one of the following two majors do you think is a better choice, and why?
1. A major that would allow him to finish years of study and get a degree sooner (so that he would begin to work full-time quickly).
2. A major that requires many years of study that would provide him with more employment opportunities and offers in the future.
It is inevitable that every student needs to face the problem about choosing the major that is suit for themselves. Therefore, it raises the question that the students should choose the major that allows them to finish the study sooner or the major that need study longer but can provide more employment opportunities. I take the position that my friend should choose the long-term major.
First of all, the major reasons for students to enter the university is to get a decent job in the future, so choosing the major that can gain more employment opportunities is more appropriate. On the contrary, if the students only want to get the degree, then it loses the meaning for students to study hard in the educational institution. Take myself for example. In Taiwan, we need to pay a lot of tuition to enter the university. Hence, when I enrolled in the school, I decided to learn more in the university and find a high-salary job in the future. Due to this determination, I concentrated on my study for about five years. Even if my leaning was longer than others, I learned my major deeply and broadly, causing me to find a good job successfully after graduation.
Furthermore, if students can study longer in the school, they could get the newest information and catch the trend around the world. To elaborate, because the university has countless opportunities cooperating with the government or company to make the new research, the students in there can easily understand what are people around the world interested in. Take my father for example. When he was the university student, he worked with his professor for about six years in the lab. By conducting those newest experiments, he understood many new theories and innovative design in the world, which was the basic knowledge for him to find a decent job.
Many people may argue that the students should go working as fast as possible because they can enhance their working experience early. However, I insist that although the working experience is important, we cannot overlook that the main reason why students can find a good job is their ability. Thus, if students can cultivate their working ability in the long-term education, they can become the asset that every company desires it. In contrast, if they only finish their study quickly and do not learn the unique knowledge, they cannot stand out from the public and need to meet serious competitive.
In conclusion, I hold the belief that my friend should choose the major that requires many years of study but can provide him more employment opportunities because it not only is the main reason why students go to the university but also can help him catch the world trend.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to su 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities Use sp 51
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When people spend a lot of time watching sports on television or following their favorite team, does it have negative effects on their lives? 73
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 63
- Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life Is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or is it better to require students to work alone 52
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2250.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89130434783 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72266965619 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460869565217 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8275019712 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179141757933 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059905275098 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686057452532 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128494609397 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818418369266 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.