By passing through the former education conditions to the new circumstances, an updating changes in education grow and appear among the human. In fact, teaching method have changed which is kind of effect on teacher’s position and their appreciating levels. As far as I am concern the valuably of teachers have been decreasing from the former to new days. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, limited things have always had the higher valuably. Considering the former education environment time, when the number of educated and the number of qualified person for teaching were not a lot. Moreover, the number of request for learning and studding among the family have been increased over the course of that time. In other word, the less the number of teachers existed the more valuable they had. One of my own example is a good case in point. My family lived in the small city and they work as teacher in a renown high school. Although they were not earning much money and were not enough renowned among people in that tiny city, they were more honored by other parents because they were the member of the small team of teaching people who had been taught for long time. This circumstances clearly illustrates the relevant between demand and existence of ability which is really valuable.
Second, Regarding the development of technology and the positive effect of them on teaching method which is known as another reason of less valuabality of teachers. By the invention of the e book and colossal amount of educational application which are applicable and uses among the children, the needed of teachers have been markedly decrease. The results of one research represent that by increasing uses of this kinds of electronical education system the needed to teachers had been noticeably decreased, which is quite disappointed for older teachers.
In conclusion, I firmly agree that the teachers are not more appreciable than before, it is not only because of the increasing number of teachers but also for the inventing new methods of teaching, by using e book instead of face to face learning.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-29:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...position and their appreciating levels. As far as I am concern the valuably of tea...
^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'decreased'.
Suggestion: decreased
...e needed of teachers have been markedly decrease. The results of one research represent ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ch represent that by increasing uses of this kinds of electronical education system ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, really, regarding, second, so, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94214876033 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6642636533 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523415977961 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5438060906 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174400430159 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506897745244 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631341941648 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101733010652 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606730954109 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.