Regarding the fact that human being are living beyond the communicational environment which encourage them to develop their idea through sharing with each other. In other words, communication is known as principle behavior in human to catch and grape their propose by each other. In this regard, some people believe that coworker can communicate in person to develop their project. However, others believe that the electronically devises would be a better option in this case. As far as I am concern face to face communicating is efficient. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that, having person connection will give you a chance to have more interaction about the problems and the solution and convey your opinion clearly over the time of handling the project. Conversely by email communicating you can not give the reflection of the idea that proposes. In fact there is no interaction to help guides to assess their problem during their process, Which is kind of time wasting. Take my personal experience as a compelling example. I was working as a leader of project in one of the courses in university and I was spouse to handle the problems with other members of team. The problem was that one of my team worker were able that time to gather in the time project making and I had to manage the problem with email. What was significantly surprises me was that I didn’t get any clear idea from others, which makes me confused. More over takes me too long time to wait for the answer from them.
Second important reason about this issues is that, an intricate presentation would not be appear by writing in the email, In fact, discussing about the details in project need to have a face to face communication rather than by email. There was a research around this fact on one groups of students that clearly represents the drastic disadvantage about this manner. The results shows that almost all research team who had successful and mature conclusion at the end of their project were had been work near each other. In other words, they work as coworker face to face not by far reaching devices like e- mail.
In conclusion, I firmly agree that classmate better to visite each other during the process of executing their project. It does not only help them do make a beneficial interactive decision, but also gave them a chance to gain more detail about their projects which by e-mail is completely impossible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 478, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... would be a better option in this case. As far as I am concern face to face commun...
^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
... over the time of handling the project. Conversely by email communicating you can not give...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 31, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...om them. Second important reason about this issues is that, an intricate presentati...
^^^^
Line 6, column 245, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ication rather than by email. There was a research around this fact on one groups of stude...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 379, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
...dvantage about this manner. The results shows that almost all research team who had s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.792147806 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63175701776 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519630484988 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3353907608 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.65 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233556625768 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689481316952 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046622035769 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146671754887 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220654505371 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.