Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher's ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
There can be many different aspects or view point that people might consider while evaluating teachers ability to interact with students and the teachers hold on the subject. In my opinion it is very important that teacher posses the quality where they can easily relate with children. I belief this way for two main reasons which I will be exploring in subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, teacher can judge a students problem and rectify mistakes only when they can understand children. This is important because many students do not want to share their problems and hence it is teachers responsibilty to help that particular student solve the issue. Moreover, there would be no use of knowledge if teacher cannot instill the concepts in a students mind. Drawing from my own personal experience, I had problems understanding basic things even though the teacher teaching the subject was considered to be a master of that subject. But this was not the case with the teacher who was a fresher and had no teaching experience because he was able to relate with students.
Additionally, teacher must be polite to students and should not vex when student ask a same question for a number of times. It is a very essential quality because if teacher get annoyed easily they might scold or even show anger. Due to this children may fear asking doubts and on top of that this might lead to wrong interpretation of concepts. When I was pursuing engineering, my juniors always had doubts in simple concepts. This was because their class teacher was harsh and impolite.
So I personally believe that teacher must have the ability to relate to students even when they have no experience in teaching or less knowledge as compared to other teachers
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
There can be many different aspects or view point that people might...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: BELIEF_BELIEVE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'believe' (verb) instead of belief (noun)?
Suggestion: believe
...they can easily relate with children. I belief this way for two main reasons which I w...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... First of all, teacher can judge a students problem and rectify mistakes only when ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 391, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'had' and 'doubts'.
Suggestion: had always doubts
... I was pursuing engineering, my juniors always had doubts in simple concepts. This was because th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, first of all, in my opinion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 295.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93559322034 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6606736257 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528813559322 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3496384533 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247328438075 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910367503921 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649908455509 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167391851964 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677562063856 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.