Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
What teachers talk at classes may heavily influence students’ performances at classes, so professors need to be careful when they structure their classes. For now, important question is whether they can talk about things that are unrelated to main lesson or not. From my perspective, I think that instructors should not discuss about societal and political situations. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will explore these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, teachers will waste the time of lecture by talking about things which are not associated with curriculum of specific subjects, so learners’ opportunity to understand concepts of main lessons diminishes. Pupils devote their valuable time to attend certain classes, and comprehend specific topics of these academic disciplines. However, if teachers squander this time by digressing from main purpose of field of studies, students cannot use their time efficiently because of their professors. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Last semester, in my mathematics course, my teacher discussed about the authorities of Mongolia, which is my native country, and their involvement in society for nearly thirty minutes. Therefore, she expended only an hour to explain theories and principles of mathematics. As a result, our class could not keep up with the curriculum of ninety minutes lesson within an hour. This example demonstrates how teachers squander time, and affect students’ performance negatively.
Secondly, pupils could be sidetracked by unimportant discussion, so they cannot pay in-depth attention to their main lesson. Students need to be attentive in order to understand some lessons such as natural science. However, when others talk about other things, they will be overwhelmed by unnecessary thoughts. For instance, at the beginning of the last semester, an instructor of physics discussed about the following elections of Mongolia. Then, I was distracted by this talk, and not paying attention to lesson when my professor started teaching about theories of physics because I could not collect myself. Consequently, I end up not understanding anything about principles he mentioned at the class.
In summation, I am of the opinion that teachers must not discuss about their opinion about political and social circumstances at lectures. This is because they will ruin invaluable time, and distract pupils’ attention.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, teachers will waste the t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1037, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ffect students’ performance negatively. Secondly, pupils could be sidetracked by...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 707, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t principles he mentioned at the class. In summation, I am of the opinion that t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, i feel, i think, such as, talking about, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54812834225 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01396204822 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561497326203 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1091741155 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126782913664 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403357696903 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388944470179 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808705614009 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435728335806 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.