TPO 21 Integrated essay
The reading and lecture are both about genetically altered trees. The author of the reading feels that changed trees are beneficial in some ways. The lecturer challanges the claims made by writer. She is of the opinion that these explanations are faulty.
To start with, the author argues that altered trees tend to survive in harsh condition, but this specific argument is challanged by the lecturer. She claims that these genetically changed woody plants are only aimed to experience specific circumstances, and cannot endure other situations.Additionally, she states survived few species of natural floras will engulf the destroyed area even though other species are wiped because of natural problems.
Secondly, the writer suggests that planting trees with new genetical structure will result in better profit. In the article, it is said that peasant will acquire money more briskly thanks to rapidly growing trees. However, the speaker refutes this by remarking that seeds of artificially made trees are more expensive and unlikely to be found from wilderness. She elaborates on this by bringing up the point that peasant will be required to buy new seeds whenever they plant the trees.
Finally, the author posits that extreme utilization of wild trees will decline in the value because new trees which grow faster will be enough supply of woods. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that the trees will pose more damage to naturally growing floras. She notes that new trees will consume much energy such as sunlight, nutrition of soil and water in order to grow rapidly.Therefore, amount of energy that wild plants uses will decline in amount vastly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nged trees are beneficial in some ways. The lecturer challanges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Additionally
...ces, and cannot endure other situations.Additionally, she states survived few species of nat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 387, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...soil and water in order to grow rapidly.Therefore, amount of energy that wild plants uses...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25093632959 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78147322535 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7321082818 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.846153846 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272011609474 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979726804972 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551379004229 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158880797069 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448997111784 0.0443174109184 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.