do you agree or disagree with the following statement
people behavior now have a negative effect on future generation comfortable life?
Behavior that today's citizens of the world may heavily influence the life situation of the following generations. I believe that contemporary people have a demeanor which is potentially beneficial for their children, grandchildren, and so on. I feel this way for three main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, many individuals are opposing the discrimination, which signifies that their successors will not be treated unfairly. There are several types of communications that involve distinguishing people from others with their specific characteristics. To name a few, individuals' amount of affluence, appearance, and stature may occasion them to be different from their peers in the eyes of others. Fortunately, a ton of people are supporting the movement that such behavior should be prohibited. If this movement succeeds, kids who will be born in the future will go through the life in which everyone treats them irrespective of their personality. As a result, their life circumstances will be pleasant. For example, until recently, people from the urban area were had been criticizing rural individuals because of their livelihood in Mongolia, my native country. For this reason, youngsters from the countryside was disliking to study in the capital of Mongolia, so they were partially unable to be educated by learning in universities in the city. However, people were constantly complaining about this immoral attitude of adults living in the municipal region, the president of my nation outlawed this kind of obvious dislike and unfair treatment two years ago. I hope that people who will be born in the countryside afterward will not experience discrimination thanks to the new law caused by contemporary folks' behavior. This example demonstrates how our behavior is building an appropriate society for our predecessors.
Secondly, The current condition of the environment is liable to be improved thanks to people living at the moment, so their offspring will live in a clean ambiance. The majority of amateur and professional conservationists are holding the opinion that nature should be preserved. Additionally, ordinary citizens are also assisting this thought. Therefore, the authorities are likely to endorse the policy to maintain environmental matters due to the suggestions of conservationists and their supporters. Hence, it seems like the governments could start implementing important projects and policies to save nature. Consequently, their successors will have a satisfactory life experience within the pleasant ambiance.
In summation, I think that the behavior of today's people can have a positive effect on the life of the next generations. This is because people from the future will not suffer from any discrimination such as racism, and they will live within the adequate nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, many individuals are oppo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 923, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...reason, youngsters from the countryside was disliking to study in the capital of Mongolia, so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1420, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'folks'' or 'folk's'?
Suggestion: folks'; folk's
...s to the new law caused by contemporary folks behavior. This example demonstrates how...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 717, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xperience within the pleasant ambiance. In summation, I think that the behavior ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i feel, i think, kind of, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2428.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50566893424 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2541776225 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544217687075 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5902315013 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.363636364 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0454545455 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135310598609 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460618940271 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502604649441 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102012760479 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045694333756 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.