Pets should be treated like family members.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons to support your opinion.
Many people have different types of pets, and they also have diverse attitude towards their domesticated animals. Personally, I believe that pets need to be respected but not as family members. In other words, owners need to consider the family members as better than pets. I feel this way for several reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, individuals have finite amount of time to care about others, so they need to expend the time by affectioning the family members but not animals. The more time people spend with their domesticated animal, the less time they will devote for the family members. Therefore, other familiar people will deserve less love and care from the people who expend too much time for their pets. For example, my girlfriend spends insufficient amount of time with me because she spends most of the time by caring her cat. Hence, I feel as not cared by the girl whom I love. If she consumes less time for her cat than how much she expends currently, I will have opportunity to be with her for a long time, which is pleasant for both of us.
Secondly, animals cannot feel and comprehend that they are being treated as human-being, which signifies that the close communication between pets and owners cannot be symbiotic. Most family members care for each other and their relationship is heavily based on give-and-take, which is the most important part of communication. To be more specific, if people get in touch with domesticated animals as member of family, they will care, feed, and handle them. However, animals are incapable of soothing and nourishing their owner. As a result of this, some individuals will be frustrated by this truth as girls get irate when their boyfriend pay not enough attention to them.
Thirdly, every species has unique living environment, which means living as mankind by being communicated as close friends by their owners may be improper for pets. In other words, although people feel fine while leading their pets to live as mankind, it will inappropriate for animals. For example, I have seen dogs with clothes for many times. Their owner says that they are respecting their dogs. Nonetheless, they are unaware of that this may even have negative consequence on their pet. Because animals have already fur to insulate their body and keep the body heat, they may lose their hair because of being warmer than usual.
Finally, most animals, especially the ones people love, live shorter than people, which means the possibility of facing their demise is high. If individuals give their entire care for animal, they feel close to their pets. Thereby, death of animals will feel like demise of family members. Hence, individuals need to circumvent this type of chance of having depression and anxiousness. Otherwise, they will be more susceptible to emotional disorder caused by the death of pets.
In summation, I am of the opinion of that people should not treat their pets as family members although people need to be reverent to domesticated creatures. This is because, people will start spending less time for others, and this type of relationship unavailable to beneficial for both sides. Furthermore, the lifestyle of people is not suitable for pets, and the demise of the beloved animals will be emotionally detrimental for the owner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 12, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erwise, they will be more susceptible to emotional disorder caused by the death o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, while, for example, i feel, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2804.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 558.0 407.700716846 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02508960573 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86024933743 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64965718302 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44623655914 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 874.8 618.680645161 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6111748143 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6896551724 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2413793103 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55172413793 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.53405017921 243% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150558451356 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529831647866 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488707346918 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758311187026 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547373501673 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.