Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that one of the most important person during people's life, are their teachers. Some people believe that teacher should not reveal their political or social points of view for the students. Others believe that it is their duty to let the students know about their personal opinions. I, personally, am inclined to the former one. In the following paragraphs, I explain my reasons to clarify my viewpoint.
First reason coming to my mind is that student like to imitate their teachers' and have the same opinions like them. During the age that children go to school, they try to treat and behave like their teachers. Because in the students' points of vies, their teacher is the one who knows every thing anout anything. Teachers can answer students questions and lead them in their essential problems. Moreover, the students maybe want to be like their teachers on some social or political issues. They want to speak like them and have the same mindset. Hence, the teacher will get the opportunity of thinking and deciding about the different phenomenon from their students. Absolutely it is better for the children to use their brain, think about the circumstances and reach their individual conclusions about the various matter. In this case, what will happen if a teacher does not have an appropriate manner of thinking about a special thing?
Another reason which deserves being mentioned here is that teachers should encourage students to consider various aspects of a matter and after that thinks about it profoundly. It is one of the most crucial duties of the teachers to activate different parts of their childrens' brain. Then, if a teacher tells her of his idea about a political or social issue, tend the students to focus on the mentione idea. Therefore, the opportunity of thinking without any bias will get of students. For instance, when I was in high school, one of our teachers was a supporter of a football club. Then he talked about the club, its players, coach, and stadium vary much. As a result, most of my friend would be on our teacher club's supporter. Even they did not know the player or the coach of the club. My friends just wanted to be like their teacher and have some common points of view like him.
To sum up, based on aforementioned paragraphs, if teachers make known their social or political view to students not only give incentive to students to mimic them, but also give the right of thinking without any preconception from them. It is the teachers' duty to make the students think as free as they want, not confine their mind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to be'.
Suggestion: to be
...thing? Another reason which deserves being mentioned here is that teachers should ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... any preconception from them. It is the teachers duty to make the students think as free...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, for instance, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2148.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81614349776 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49222483349 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484304932735 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 636.3 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3888512145 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.92 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.84 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254695818417 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769204814764 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610812754807 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179349484526 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277373061329 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.