Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nowadays, people are surrounded by different kinds of information, including the political news, social events, entertainment gossiping. While it comes to whether teachers should tell their own thoughts about society and policy to students or not. Some people do not agree with this idea since those views might influence the students’ thought later, which will do harm to self-cognization of students. However, l am a strongly believer that teacher could let the student know current society and policy. Here are main reasons for my opinion.

Firstly, if the students early have access to recognize the situation about this society, their later career and life will be benefit. The reason is that students are innocent and they are always burdened with much homework, so they have no time to care for the events happened in the society. Therefore, the teacher served as a guider have a power to help students to know outside world, such as the recent …. and with the assistant of the teacher, students would insight into the society much more completely. They will learn about the fresh event and have their own view about those events, which might contribute a lot to their later thoughts after graduating.

Secondly, it is obvious that teacher in the school need student not only to acquire the knowledge but also to open up their eyes to the outside. It is because that today students are more willing to be versatile than be a person that just equipped with tedious knowledge. Therefore, teachers could provide their views about society and policy for students, which might increase students thought towards various events. In this way, students are more likely to become an all-rounded people because they have unique thought when faced with different events.

Admittedly, social and political views that teachers tell to the students might play a negative role in students’ life because teacher perhaps expose the darkness of the society to students. However, teachers act as a beacon will be more likely to lead their students to be outstanding than immoral. To a degree, teacher will pass by many energetic views to students.

In a word, l contend that it is a definitely necessary way for students to learn much social and political views from teachers.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('strongly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('believer') instead of another adjective.
...-cognization of students. However, l am a strongly believer that teacher could let the student know...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...w outside world, such as the recent …. and with the assistant of the teacher, stud...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.112 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61926673369 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506666666667 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8609229743 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239414098247 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856644877484 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350528239662 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155017426354 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331912763061 0.0645574589148 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.