Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
In the modern era, Social and political views is essential for every nation. When the citizens of a country have been good educated and learned social and political sciences, they could have a great influence on the all aspect of country. Although, many of people and researcher believe that, teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom, In my opinion, Teachers must share their social or political views with their student and discuss about them. In follow, I will elaborate two reasons for my claim.
The first exquisite reason to be mentioned is social and political science is essential for students. Many of educations should started from law ages like Social and political sciences. If social and political discussion had learned in school period, it could be mindset of the people when she become adult. They can accept many social and political challenge easier than people don’t have these skills. For parable, when I was a student at the elementary school, we had a time for discussing and thinking about social and political issues each week. This time was very suit for us, because our teacher denoted a prize for the best idea about social and political solution. Therefore, we learned many social sciences, and political decision in country.
Second reason that convince me is, political and social discussion help the student to improve cooperation skills in society. When A teacher debate her social and political views, he encourage his student to think and incorporate about socials challenge, this method prepare students to be sensitive about social and political events. The newest research about at the Social and Health Life Center in the northern California university depicted, more than 75 percent of students that educated from school with social and political treatment have a high corporate in the last election in the U.S. Hence, pay attention to the social or political views, at school could have a indeniable effect on the students.
In short, with aforementioned it concluded that, while some people said it is not suitable that teachers tell about their social or political views at classroom, in my viewpoint, not only discussing about social or political issues is suitable, but also it is essential and must be a part of the classes education for basic and regularly effect such as social cooprations and rudimentary education that the society need.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'encourages'.
Suggestion: encourages
...bate her social and political views, he encourage his student to think and incorporate a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 679, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r political views, at school could have a indeniable effect on the students. I...
^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at classroom, in my viewpoint, not only discussing about social or political is...
^^
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'classes'' or 'class's', 'classis's'?
Suggestion: classes'; class's; classis's
... is essential and must be a part of the classes education for basic and regularly effe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, while, in short, such as, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3042394015 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77134672755 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516209476309 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 185.207398913 48.9658058833 378% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 151.928571429 100.406767564 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6428571429 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333417039804 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131918713723 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109356825431 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245374916052 0.150856017488 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09353478882 0.0645574589148 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.