If you are going to graduate from the university and have to choose the final course, which professor will you choose; the one whose courses you used to sign up for or the one you have never learned from before
Throughout history, education has played a prominent role in all societies. Due to its paramount importance researchers have strived to find the effective factors and make the outcome more fruitful, manipulating this factor. The controversial question which is raised regarding this topic is whether the final course should be taken with a familiar professor or with a completely new one. A plethora of people possesses the conviction that the former is more advantageous, whereas others hold the exact opposite opinion. I personally contend that the former is more beneficial, considering the two following reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that knowing the process of a class puts you in a prior position. In each course, it takes some time for attendants to get familiar with the order and the requisites of the course. Having known the professor's approach, the person's time and effort would be saved. Professors mainly have the same approach for their courses. Moreover, the way of questioning and evaluating the projects and homework also remains the same. Hence, it eases the path for the students who are already familiar with this process. My own experience is a compelling example of this issue. For my last optional course in university, I took a course with a professor that I had taken other courses with, in other semesters. Since I knew he is highly impressed by projects involving hardware, rather than just researching, I also made the hardware of the project. Therefore, I got an A-plus for that course. Had I not known this fact about the professor, I would not be able to get an outstanding result.
Another reason which deserves some word here is that the issue of how much a professor help the student is highly affected by the fact that how much the professor knows the student. Students can try their best to perform great on their final course and since the professor already knows them, it makes it easier for them to bring the professor’s attention to their work. Should the professor see the student's potential and hard work, he considers the student for the upcoming research positions. It is also beneficial for getting a good recommendation for their future jobs or even attending other universities. The noteworthy statistics, revealed by recent social research conducted in by the human behavior researchers in my university, show that more than half of the professors prefer to hire the students whose performance they are familiar with in their laboratory research project. Therefore, taking a class with a familiar professor elevates the chance of being recognized by the professor and take part in the professor's researches.
Excellent work.
In winding up the discussion on this moot point, contemplating all the aforementioned arguments, one can easily conclude that taking the final course with an already known professor is more beneficial. This is because in this case, they are already familiar with the theme of the professor's classes and consequently, it is easier for them to handle. Furthermore, students have a higher chance of being a part of the professor's team or getting a good recommendation from him, by getting him to know their potential during multiple courses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ing known the professors approach, the persons time and effort would be saved. Profess...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2880.0 1977.66487455 146% => OK
No of words: 533.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40337711069 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15007760579 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540337711069 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 836.1 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4523034784 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2083333333 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173640375065 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481053160184 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354008389021 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107215009764 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301030458189 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 86.8835125448 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.