Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by the society in the past than they are nowadays
The position of teachers is now on heated debated. While teachers obviously play a part in one's education, some people say that their importance are decreasing in the public's eye. I agree that teachers do not have as high esteem as they used to in the past for the following reasons.
First of all, less appreciation is attributed to teachers as there are more sources of knowledge nowadays. In the past, books were rare and hard to access. People mainly obtained knowledge from their teachers, who not only conveyed information but also gave instruction on which reference materials to read among millions of books. However, the advent of internet and search engine has facilitated human's self-study process. People can learn almost anything from the Internet, where there are abundant of learning resources as well as study guide. Therefore, teachers are not as essential and hence as much valued as they used to be in the past. For example, during my mother's childhood, teachers were one of the most highly respected career in the society. Whenever she needed to know more deeply or widely about the subject, she would come to her teacher to ask for answers for her questions or advice on which reference book in the library to consult. However, nowadays, whenever my brothers has an academic problem, he would turn to Google search at first. He choice of reading materials also usually depends on reviews on the Internet instead of teacher's one. Obviously, the role of teacher in one's study is not as cherished as they were years ago.
In addition, the society also loses respect of teachers because of the materialism trend. Those transmitting knowledge is nowadays not as much admired as businesspeople who made billions of Dollars. Surveys have shown that the majority of young adults in today's world think much more highly of and billionaires, who actually create wealth, than their teachers, who used to be one of most inflated in the past. Moreover, due to the materialism, some teachers resort to extreme behaviors, which creates bad image of teachers in the society. An illustration is my brother's Literature teacher in his grade eight. Since the salary is not high enough for her to afford a proper living, she forced her students to attend her tutoring class outside the schools to earn an extra amount. Anyone who did not join the class would definite receive low score at formal class, no matter how well he or she performed in the exam. Her action has contributed to growing teachers' infamy these days. It seems that materialism has led to a decline in the society's respect of teachers.
In conclusion, I believe that teachers used to be more recognized and valued in the past than they do at present. To my view, teachers should exert efforts to improve themselves to regain their reputation while the government should take measures to adjust society's attitude to teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...While teachers obviously play a part in ones education, some people say that their i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...here are abundant of learning resources as well as study guide. Therefore, teacher...
^^
Line 3, column 1200, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... one. Obviously, the role of teacher in ones study is not as cherished as they were ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2414.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94672131148 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63451281137 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536885245902 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6134593611 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.56 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.52 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252437669152 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732669085155 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773597104691 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170346652596 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415347165498 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.