Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The debates on what time teachers are recognized more - in the past or today has garnered a range of views. Nowadays, many are adamant that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration to check the constructive and destructive facets of this issue. Some people posit that school teachers are prized today more than in the past. On the other hand, some others take the opposite side and disagree. From my vantage point, I concur with the former group. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
The first exquisite point to be considered is the augment of education's value in society today. In a narrow condition, a teaching process has become an essential element in our society. Consequently, the teacher's value has climbed noticeably in the community. A vivid example that can shed light on this subject is one from my country. According to the statics, the value of teachers has increased dramatically since the 1970s due to the increase in the value of education and schooling process in my country. All in all, there is a strong relationship between the value of teachers and the value of education in society.
Secondly, another reason which deserves some words to say is that the number of teachers in the community has also climbed significantly. Teachers have become an important component of our society. Moreover, the teaching profession has become one of the most ubiquitous professions in the job market. Fortunately, this dramatic increase in the number of teachers has a positive impact on the value of the teacher. For instance, the number of teachers in my country has climbed from hundreds at the end of the 1960s to about 90 thousand at the end of 2019. And as a result, the statics have revealed that the teachers now are more prized than in the past.
To wrap it up, in the light of above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that teachers today are more respected than in the past due to the increase in the teaching importance in the community also the growth of the teachers' numbers.
- The cost of converting money from one national currency to another is very high Moreover differences in currency value can make market prices unstable discouraging international trade and travel A group of countries in Europe has been able to avoid many o3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.60
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.70
- Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons.First, th83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rst exquisite point to be considered is the augment of educations value in society today. I...
Line 13, column 219, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...in the community also the growth of the teachers numbers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8615819209 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7748351978 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480225988701 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3493187363 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5789473684 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6315789474 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201113252399 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636170711173 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470924859941 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123729944675 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00617569845815 0.0645574589148 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.