Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Recently, there has been a ton of debate as to whether teachers are still appreciated and valued as before. In my opinion, I definitely believe that teachers were more respected in the past. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in this essay.
First of all, the importance of the teacher as a source of knowledge for students has declined nowadays. Teachers used to be the most significant source for students to acquire knowledge, but with the development of technology, it has become much easier for students to search unknown information through internet. For example, before the internet if students got difficulty in understanding a topic in his science class he had to go to the teacher and ask for an explanation. While nowadays, he could simply search for the answers through the internet where he might find even more detailed information that could assist him to understand the subject better. Consequently, there is no need for him to go to the science teacher any more.Therefore teachers are not valued by the society as they were.
Secondly, the attractiveness of teacher as a career has also receded. The teacher used to be a sacred job, because they were well paid and were sincerely respected by the students. However, currently many other professionals such as businessmen, accountants or engineers earn much more than teachers.This is best demonstrated by my personal experience. When my parents choose college after graduating from high school, they and their peers were prone to study school of education, because a teacher was an promising career at that time of period. In contrast, as it was my turn, my parents urged me to select high technology related majors. As we can see, teacher as a career is not as fascinating as the past.
In conclusion, I am fully convinced that the significance of teachers in the society has declined nowadays. This is because their prestige as a tutor who impart knowledge to students has been brought down, and because their attractiveness as a career has weakened.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ecently, there has been a ton of debate as to whether teachers are still appreciated and valu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...m to go to the science teacher any more.Therefore teachers are not valued by the society ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...m to go to the science teacher any more.Therefore teachers are not valued by the society ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... engineers earn much more than teachers.This is best demonstrated by my personal exp...
^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ool of education, because a teacher was an promising career at that time of period...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99415204678 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98007587622 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538011695906 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5391315244 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.875 5.45110844103 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191261183263 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693420139104 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597642080564 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108241904519 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407607522331 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.