Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nowadays, television advertising has become very popular among companies which want to attract customers and different television advertising are designed to attract customers from different ages. However, some people argues that the television advertising directed towards young children aged from two to five should be banned. As far as I am concerned, I don't agree with this opinion.

First of all, most television advertising have positive effect on educating the young kids. Fore example, there is a television advertising of a toothpaste product designed for little kids. The advertising does not only emphasize the tasty favor of the toothpaste but also emphasize the importance of brushing teeth every day. When the little kids are attracted by the television, they will also remember the importance of brushing their teeth everyday.

Moreover, companies and television stations have the right to broadcast whatever advertising they want as long as the content of the advertising is healthy and does not do any harm to the young children. If the young teenagers, adults and elder people can be the target of the television advertising, there is no reason why the young children can not be the target. It is not fair for the companies whose products are mainly targeting the young children. Even though the parents are those who have the power to decide whether to buy the products or not, but there is nothing wrong to get young children interacted with the advertising, since at the end of the day, they are the end users of the products.

Last but not least, television advertising can help young children to keep themselves creative and broaden their imagination. Indeed, good television advertising is as effective as good movies in cultivating children's innovation. Nowadays, many companies will use scientific story or fairy story as the background of their advertising, they will use cute carton to demonstrate those stories and blend their products into the stories. In this way, the children will not only receive the message about the products but also get themselves involved into the imagination process of the stories.

All in all, despite some bad effects that brought by the television advertising to the young children, I believe that it is beneficial for young children to be exposed to the television advertising.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... be banned. As far as I am concerned, I dont agree with this opinion. First of al...
^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... the importance of brushing their teeth everyday. Moreover, companies and television...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23872679045 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85803571926 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488063660477 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4453593631 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.4375 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5625 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5625 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280943757064 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996975330939 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833517256037 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164594192508 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683211733502 0.0645574589148 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.