Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today\'s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today’s hectic world, people are overwhelmed with expectations and workload. They are always seeking a way to cope with this issue. Two strategies have been often suggested by experienced people. The first one is that doing the work quickly even though it might result in some mistakes. On the other hand, others believe, the accuracy of tasks should not be sacrificed for the speediness of the work. Personally, I am of the opinion that the advantages of doing the tasks accurately but slowly far outweigh that the other strategy. In the following paragraph, I will delve into the reasons and examples justifying my point of view.
The first reason that coming to my mind is that doing tasks in an accurate way with a slow pace results in not high-quality work but also numerous rewards for employees. In spite of keeping up pace with the fast-changing era, the accurateness is still appreciated by most employers as they are aware of myriad benefits that bring about by high-quality works. Therefore, this strategy enhances the chances of getting a promotion and a raise at the workplace. For instance, big corporations predominantly evaluate every staff at the end of the year by assessing their high performance at the workplace rather than the volume of work that is done.
Another noteworthy reason is that some flaws can lead to irreparable damage to the prestige of employees and the companies they work in. Doing the given tasks as fast as possible can bring about a decrease in the accuracy of the process of doing the work which may lead to detrimental effects. For instance, in research working on finding treatment for specific diseases, careless work could cause different and false outcomes. So, employees should avoid sacrificing the accurateness to the swift pace of working.
From what has been discussed above, we may conclude that accomplishing the task in an accurate way even slowly is a better policy to complete the work as this way not only benefit the employees and employer by precision but also prevent many adverse outcomes that flaws can cause.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have often been
...to cope with this issue. Two strategies have been often suggested by experienced people. The fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 61, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an accurate way" with adverb for "accurate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t coming to my mind is that doing tasks in an accurate way with a slow pace results in not high-qu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an accurate way" with adverb for "accurate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ay conclude that accomplishing the task in an accurate way even slowly is a better policy to compl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... adverse outcomes that flaws can cause.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, for instance, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97421203438 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78152517364 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561604584527 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7810661762 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181718598729 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582180689383 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391466849955 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10769045536 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460971667455 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.