Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Cars are widely used in the current period for transportation. In my opinion, the number of cars will not reduce in the next twenty years but they will increase especially because they are not only economical but also convenient.
First of all, cars are one of the most convenient modes of transportation as they are owned by individuals and they can be used anytime and travel to anyplace they need. For example, after my graduation, I joined a software company which was located in a different state. I started my new job and was in search of an economical place to live as I was tight on budget. I could only get one which is five miles away from my office as all the rest were out of my budget range. I tried using public transport every day but that was very inconvenient because the buses and trains do not stop near my home. I had to travel another half a mile from the bus stop to reach my home. Also, the timings were not rigid. Sometimes the buses would come early and sometimes late. I soon manged to buy a car for myself and then I was able to travel at my own convenience. In addition to it, a car also shows the social status of a person. For instance, a person who owns a car is considered wealthy in my country as many people can not afford to own one. So people generally buy bigger and fancier cars to show off their financial status. Thus people will prefer to buy cars.
Also, one might argue that with the limited availability of fossil fuels and the pollution being caused by cars, they might soon be reduced in usage. But I think with the advent of technology, the latest cars use electricity which can be produced using many renewable energy resources like sunlight and water. This way, soon the cars will not only become cheaper but also will reduce the burden of paying a lot of money on fuels like petrol and diesel. Once they become economical, common people will also be able to buy them. Using electric cars will also reduce the amount of pollution that is currently being caused. the amount of carbon dioxide that will be emitted will reduce and it will become environment-friendly.
In conclusion, I believe that considering the convenience provided by cars as opposed to public transport and also the economical prices will motivate the common men to buy cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...l the rest were out of my budget range. I tried using public transport every day ...
^
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...es and trains do not stop near my home. I had to travel another half a mile from ...
^
Line 9, column 621, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...llution that is currently being caused. the amount of carbon dioxide that will be e...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55048076923 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56922352709 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507211538462 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9580910547 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0454545455 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86363636364 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185071558962 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593690485109 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551793378781 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124262530111 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637632154181 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.