Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Means of transportation for human beings has been changing rapidly through our history. It probably started by using humans as the vehicle, and nowadays we are using sophisticated technologies such as airplanes and advanced cars. Therefore, it might be difficult to predict the future of transportation tools. There will be more cars on the near-future horizon because cars are not only getting cheaper but also they are becoming more comfortable. Moreover, cities are getting even bigger. Thus, people will be more willing to use cars in the future.
First of all, people migrate from rural areas to metropolitan areas in search of a better, and more comfortable life. Therefore, the cities will get bigger in the future, hence that will raise the demand for cars to be put in use. Since public transportation is proved to be ineffective in many large cities, it seems reasonable to predict that will prefer using more cars for their transportation purposes.
Aside from the point, I made above, one cannot oversee the fact that cars are getting more advanced and comfortable. People will develop an interest in buying and using them in the future. Technology can be developed base on the needs of the client, such as advanced seatbelts and airbags around the cabin, raising the safety of cars. Moreover, digital technologies have their way into the car industry, making it more comfortable. For instance, when a person gets into a car, the central management unit of cars will adapt seats, temperature, and mirrors of the vehicle, automatically based on previous adjustments of the person. Therefore, since cars are more desirable, more people will yearn for having and using one. A good example of this is Tesla, Tesla has incorporated high-tech such as auto-driving and seat heating, it has made Tesla a car that everyone dreams for.
Secondly, cars are getting cheaper. At the infantry period of the car industry, automatic vehicles were luxurious tools that only the lords could afford. However, as the industry grew into a mass production level, cars became less expensive. The same trajectory is predicted for car prices in the future: cars will probably be even cheaper and more affordable for the mass. Cheaper cars will induce people to buy one.
In a word, owing to the aforementioned causes described in the previous paragraphs, it appears to be reasonable to draw the well-founded conclusion that there will be more cars put in use in the next 20 years because there are larger cities that demand cars to be used as transportation. Since there is a high demand, cars will be cheaper while retaining their quality regarding safety and comfort.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.075 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8036566663 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504545454545 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1421946037 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0869565217 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1304347826 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65217391304 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232809635045 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820727578885 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663835661593 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165483235106 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444576182663 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.