Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should spend more money on improving facilities (e.g. labs and general equipment) than on hiring famous professors.
In the Modern era, universities play a pivotal role in the society because there is a place in which students are enlisting their professors’ helping hand and push back the frontiers of knowledge every day. Some people possess the conviction that universities should invest more money in enhancing the infrastructure and facilities. Nevertheless, others believe that it is a more prudent course of action to spend more money on hiring famous professors. I am of the opinion that improving facilities will have far-reaching effects on the students’ future. In what follows, I will elaborate on my viewpoint.
First and foremost, students need such facilities to reach an in-depth understanding of what they have learned. In other words, using proper facilities and infrastructure, they will be able to put their knowledge into action, so they will have more chance to land a decent job in the future. It goes without saying that landing a better job will provide students with the golden opportunity to earn more money and have a better life. My own experience is a case in point. When I was a student in a well-known university in my country, the university provide students with a lot of scientific facilities. Therefore, they were able to go there and test what they were taught in classes, which lead to learning courses practically. After graduation, I could easily find a well-paid job in a computer programming company and be successful. Had the university not had such facilities, all students including me would not have been able to land a decent job.
The second noteworthy reason to be mentioned is that since studying is a demanding and boring task, it is likely that as time elapses, students find themselves drawn into a certain degree of depression. Besides, they may face some physical health problem owing to their sedentary lifestyles. It is axiomatic that the more exercising facilities be available for them, the more they could keep in shape and maintain their good health. Moreover, Students could relieve their stresses by exercising on a regular basis. In the research conducted in my country in 2020, the factor affected the prosperity and health of students during their studying were analyzed. The results revealed that students who had access to better sport and entertainment facilities, were happier and healthier than other students who did not have such an access. To put it another way, former group students did not have any stress, nor did they have physical problems arose from sedentary lifestyle. Thus, they were more likely to get a better job and be happy in the future.
Aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that spending money on facilities is better idea. Not only does it help students to be more knowledgeable and get a more money-making job in their future life, but also it helps them to be healthier and happier in their life. It is suggested that universities allot more budget to improving their labs and general equipment to enable students to have a more prosperous and more joyful life.
Comments
I always get 22 out of 30,…
I always get 22 out of 30, no matter of what i have written
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 824, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...an other students who did not have such an access. To put it another way, former group st...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, well, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2553.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02559055118 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89002860358 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494094488189 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 800.1 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9418008925 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54166666667 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171716294236 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538452911122 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648161021437 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134125338439 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778542491609 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.