Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Undoubtedly, the establishment of universities, colleges, and other educational institutions provides students with ample opportunities to be equipped with the most potent capacity, which is called knowledge. While many believe that the budget allocated to universities should only be spent on the educational side of the story, on places such as classes and libraries, others strongly assume that sport and social activities are also noteworthy and should be received equal budget; personally speaking, I agree to the idea of equality in the funding for sport and social activities similar to libraries and classes. The reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder.
First, attending school and university is considered an initiation of a long-term process of life. It begins with diagnosing some high-level social affairs, familiarity with the favored major, and enhancing friendship circles, vital to real life. Presentation in society is definitely related to scientific adeptness; still, social experiences must have been highly improved to freely express our ideas and protect ourselves in the high-speed competitive world in different aspects. For instance, when I accepted in the biology department, I did not have enough self-confidence to pay a lecture or even speak with my colleagues conveniently. However, after participating in a social workshop, it became feasible to discourse at length about diverse subjects in different situations to the extent that I hardly ever remember my shy personality. All of such pivotal developments resulted from a social organization in university.
Another reason that persuades me to vote for an equal budget for extracurricular activities like sport is that all students encourage staying healthy, relieving stress, and diagnosing their athletic talents if they have. In other words, universities had better provide a place to discover talented students in two fields, science and sport in parallel. Taking my experience as an example, When I entered university, my main goal was only education, hence exceedingly studied to be proud in a scientific field. Once I realized I got acute back pain, which prolonged for a year. After treatment, I decided to follow a sport plan, so I selected bodybuilding as my favorite workout. My coach noticed I had a genuine gift in muscle growth and introduced me to the national team's chosen bodybuilding. It became one of the most outstanding events that ever changed my approach to lifestyle. Being extremist usually concludes in a negative outcome. Regarding that point, allocating an equal budget for science and sport seems definitely logical.
In conclusion, considering the aforementioned reasons and examples, it is a compelling result that allocating equal funds to sport and academic sections is definitely rational because development is necessary for social and academic aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 690, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder. First, attending school and university i...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m a social organization in university. Another reason that persuades me to vote...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and sport seems definitely logical. In conclusion, considering the aforement...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, regarding, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2463.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57239819005 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19898061838 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601809954751 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 791.1 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.5277252559 48.9658058833 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.631578947 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2631578947 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190557569769 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482268112004 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500693328229 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115759063697 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507496895957 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 58.1214874552 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.01818996416 129% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 86.8835125448 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.0 10.002688172 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.