Do you agree or disagree with the following statement University students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of study

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
University students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of study.

By far the most visible alteration of the current world is the modernization that is based on the advance of science. This strengthens the irrefutable role of science subjects in most universities’ curriculum, especially when even these compulsory basic classes are commissioned to be taken by every single alumnus. Personally, I lean on this idea because not only does science include practical usage, but it also widens students’ future career paths.
First of all, human life turns out to be simpler with the application of science to solve daily problems. To illustrate, students are taught in chemistry that oil is not dissolved by water. Therefore, a person will save a lot of time if they use soap to clean their oily kitchen, instead of using only water. Furthermore, lack of knowledge of basic science sometimes drives people to fatality.There are several cases that local people are poisoned now that they use coal to get warm in winter. These people have a feature in common that they are not educated about basic science. Therefore, science helps people’s lives get easier as well as avoid pathetic cases.
Secondly, better employment opportunities are exerted owing to high knowledge of science. When people apply for a job, they have to compete with hundreds of other candidates for a vacant position. Thereby, possessing a high education of science is an advantage compared to other applicants because most work these days includes more or less scientific factors. Furthermore, once former workers are eliminated under any reasons from mandatory retirement to poor performance in employing science and technology in work, novices with a wealth of knowledge regarding science seem to gain valuable chances to climb the higher ladder of success. The fact that manual work is gradually superseded by technology indicates that without a deep source of science knowledge, there will be more chances for workers to face the axe. For example, my brother easily got accepted to a famous company, defeating other applicants thanks to his great experience in using computers and codes. This proves the correctness of requiring students to take science classes in universities.
In conclusion, college students should be required to take science classes now that it makes their life easier and brings back several valuable cha

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 393, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...nce sometimes drives people to fatality.There are several cases that local people are...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 631, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...science helps people’s lives get easier as well as avoid pathetic cases. Secondl...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, more or less

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1968.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26203208556 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85118525217 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596256684492 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9853089635 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.764705882 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23529411765 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233124573958 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711567358468 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067495302466 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150320928352 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374371520828 0.0645574589148 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.