University students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of the study

Essay topics:

University students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of the study.

Together with the improvements in society, it seems evident that people are required to have outstanding qualifications to succeed. Due to the advent of the fourth industrial revolution, scientists doing a lot of interdisciplinary research, some celebrities who did not know jack about science succeeded in other areas, in particular arts. Thus, there is a long-standing issue on whether undergraduates must complete basic science courses by force. It is an inevitable phenomenon that schools put the basic science class obligatory in their general education curriculum because students can work more efficiently and alleviate their unstable future careers.

Students should have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects, improving their efficiency and productivity overall. Often people who have cramped knowledge can think from different perspectives but utilize only certain problem-solving methods. On the other hand, people with knowledge in diverse areas can approach problems with a more insightful outlook by combining various approaches and bringing about creative and efficient results. As for my sister, for instance, when going to a university, to get a bachelor’s degree, majoring in marketing, she needed to take basic science classes. After graduating, she worked at the local IT Company, and she and the other co-workers were directed to design advertisements for the company's new semiconductor components. While the other co-workers who majored only in marketing just concentrated on copying the information of the items by a hard manual book, my sister contemplated how to convey this information easier to customers as effectively as possible and convince them to buy the product. Consequently, with her knowledge of physics, she could devise the best advertisement leading to a big success. This example demonstrates that having broad knowledge can increase a person's productivity and efficiency.

Besides what helps people work efficiently, the most important reason is that people’s careers are guaranteed burgeons by learning basic science. Competitive, due to the employment difficulty and the economic crisis, called Great Lockdown caused by Covid-19, though contemporary society is, inevitable is it for youngsters to show standing out the specification of them to admissions of companies or public organizations. One of the easiest ways to gain a competitive edge over others is to prove abilities to work in different fields, particularly in basic science, and possess various skills. According to a study done by YT University, the importance of basic science is looming large since it is impossible to discover new technology without the fields. The statistics in the study showed that the percentage that people who took basic science classes is higher than those who did not. This is because, with the liquidity, organizations seek out people who have taken science classes. As a result, to be hired in companies, students cannot but take basic science classes.

In conclusion, universities may well demand taking basic science classes of students. Students can perform their works with their bag of tricks by taking basic science courses. Undergraduates who finished the courses can open the door to the cramped employment market. With the emphasis on basic science, corporates want to pick people who know the subjects; their school transcript that includes basic science courses can only prove this.

Votes
Average: 9 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e their unstable future careers. Students should have a broad knowledge o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: Companies
... graduating, she worked at the local IT Company, and she and the other co-workers were ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...t having broad knowledge can increase a persons productivity and efficiency. Bes...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nnot but take basic science classes. In conclusion, universities may well dem...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while, as for, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2934.0 1977.66487455 148% => OK
No of words: 525.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58857142857 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12955569065 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 297.0 212.727598566 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565714285714 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 896.4 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0610520939 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.565217391 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8260869565 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4347826087 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216879571208 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698264555104 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079793299907 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144529254797 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612509223762 0.0645574589148 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 168.0 86.8835125448 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e their unstable future careers. Students should have a broad knowledge o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: Companies
... graduating, she worked at the local IT Company, and she and the other co-workers were ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...t having broad knowledge can increase a persons productivity and efficiency. Bes...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nnot but take basic science classes. In conclusion, universities may well dem...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while, as for, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2934.0 1977.66487455 148% => OK
No of words: 525.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58857142857 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12955569065 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 297.0 212.727598566 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565714285714 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 896.4 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0610520939 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.565217391 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8260869565 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4347826087 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216879571208 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698264555104 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079793299907 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144529254797 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612509223762 0.0645574589148 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 168.0 86.8835125448 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.