Nowadays, students do many things like surfing the internet, listening to music when they are learning. Do you agree or disagree that doing other things has s bad effect on learning?
Nowadays, with the development of technology, many people can do many things when they want, such as listening to music, searching the internet, and other activities. It is impossible for people to do everything at the same time, so, there are debates about how these adversely affect on studying. Some people think that doing many things gives negative influences on learning. However, doing other things are good for studying rather than telling reversely on because of people can relieve their stress, enlarge their relationships with others who work or are educated in the same field, and get a lot of information on the internet.
First of all, people can get rid of their stress by other methods such as listening to music, watching YouTube and so on. People are under a lot of stress and pressure due to this competitive today's society. By doing that, people can forget about their schoolwork and be refreshed, so, when the students return to work they can do more efficiently. For example, in my case, when I was in high school, I often suffered from arduous school works, assignments, and other things, and this made me stressful a lot. However, by listening to music or watching YouTube videos, I could recover my mental and focus on my works again. If not did I use the media, I would not moderate my mind.
Another reason is that I can widen my relationships with others who study in similar areas. When browsing the internet, people can find community sites with people with the same or close majors, and apps with open chat capabilities allow people to talk to others in their fields using any search terms. Through this, they can study and get acquainted with people from near spheres. For instance, in my case, I usually utilize Open Chatting System in Kakao talk and seek open chatting rooms with respect to my majors. Then, when talking to others, I can study and review the topics of my majors. As a result, the app affects the affirmative on learning for me, not the opposite effects.
The most crucial reason is to gain information or materials thanks to the internet. There are numerous information and files as well as free online lectures on the internet, and people can gain them quickly when just searching words related to them. The items are usually helpful for comprehending their school works. For example, currently, I am preparing for Caltech Transfer Entrance Exam, and it covered upper-undergraduate Physics and Mathematics. At first, I could not perceive the subject only on my own because of my grade, freshman. However, by virtue of online courses on YouTube, I can easily dig the materials.
In conclusion, other activities give me positive results rather than negative. This is because I can reduce my stress by music and funny videos. Also, by employing chatting apps or community websites, I can broaden my relationships with other people and be aided as instructive, sharing knowledge with them. Lastly, taking advantage of the internet lavish a lot of materials or data for me to grasp learning topics or contents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...e are debates about how these adversely affect on studying. Some people think that doing ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...ss and pressure due to this competitive todays society. By doing that, people can forg...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ube, I can easily dig the materials. In conclusion, other activities give me ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2551.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 519.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91522157996 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69698453741 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49710982659 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 785.7 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4497554255 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1153846154 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9615384615 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.96153846154 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192962315945 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584099392103 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781831666355 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120053688365 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100200365721 0.0645574589148 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.