Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country.
Every country has lots of new things to know and there are some ways to learn about a country. Some people may hold the view that the best way to know about a country is reading its history books or visiting some related websites whereas I believe that visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country. In the following paragraphs, some conspicuous reasons will cogently substantiate my perspective.
The main reason is that you can found much information about the culture of a country by visiting its historical places and museums. In the museums, you can be aware of the political hierarchy of regimes which dominated (governed) on a country, the kings, the battles between that country and other countries in the past, and some remained historical relics. According to a famous statement, the past of a country builds its future. So, you can realize what things were sanctified (holy/ sacred) for the people of that country by seeing their trophies. You would be able to know about rituals and rites of the country by visiting their antique stuff, paintings, musical instruments, etc. in the museums. Take the Golestan Palace, which has remained from the Ghajaar period in Iran and is a museum to public visiting now. You can find plenty of furniture, paintings, dishes, jewelries and so on. By visiting museums, you will even be aware of ancient industries of a certain country. It would be possible, For instance, by viewing the stones used in the jewelries and the aircrafts.
Another equally noteworthy point is that by visiting museums, you could be familiar with some artists of a country. For instance, there are numerous paintings on canvas in the Louvre Museum at France painted by Leonardo Da vinci. In some of them, Da vinci depicted the people's lifestyle at that era. Their clothing, trade, and predominant occupation on that period of time are obvious in his paintings. Moreover, in Photography museums you can get some information in the photos. For example, in the Negaarestan museum in Iran, there is a photo which demonstrates the first time when the telephone was entered in Iran by Mozafaredin Shah, about 150 years ago.
In conclusion, it is for all the aforementioned, I have come to believe that visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country. As a matter of fact, there are some other reasons that can be invoked to support my point of view, but let's suffice to this.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... In some of them, Da vinci depicted the peoples lifestyle at that era. Their clothing, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ade, and predominant occupation on that period of time are obvious in his paintings. Moreover,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...nvoked to support my point of view, but lets suffice to this.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83574879227 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67121365475 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485507246377 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.941030213 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.88709677419 327% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314255573977 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903838578177 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954186464785 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207783906746 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672545092342 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.