It's better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older.
Traveling to foreign countries have an influential impact in our lives and brings us some advantages to make some decisions. A controversial question occupying mind is whether it is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger than when you are older. Some people may be inclined toward the opinion that it is better to visit different countries when you are older than when you are younger. I, nonetheless, believe that it is better to travel to different countries when you are younger. In the following paragraphs, some conspicuous reasons will cogently substantiate my perspective.
the main reason coming to my mind is that travelling leads you lots of experiences, especially traveling to visit other countries. In this way, you will be familiar with various cultures and different people. Communicating with more people absolutely enhance your experience in the life. One of the achievements could be learning a new language far better during communicating with native people who speak that certain language daily. Seeing various cultures may help you to learn many things and it brings new idea which can be invoked to different aspect of your life.
Another equally noteworthy point in supporting my point of view is that viewing several country would help you broaden your perspective. You could see in some matters through different lens of view while in your country and by your culture, there were not the possibility of seeing to the matter from other angles. Therefore, you will be able to make better decision by considering more aspects of that. Sometimes this decision may affect your whole future. For instance, if you visit a certain country which you always wished to live there, you will have a chance of knowing some fact of that society and their culture and their people closely. Maybe you find that there is not that desirable place you would think about it as your future destination to live previously. Thus, it would be better to travel there when you are young and did not made the big decision, because after your immigration to there, it would be too late to change your mind since you probably spend pretty money and made big effort to reach to that situation.
To sum up, it is for all the aforementioned, I have come to believe that it may be much better to travel to foreign countries when you are younger instead of when you are older. As a matter of fact, there are some other reasons and examples that can be invoked to support my viewpoint, but let's suffice to this.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ogently substantiate my perspective. the main reason coming to my mind is that t...
^^^
Line 4, column 845, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...el there when you are young and did not made the big decision, because after your im...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1036, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... big effort to reach to that situation. To sum up, it is for all the aforementio...
^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...be invoked to support my viewpoint, but lets suffice to this.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, as a matter of fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87297921478 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64148922857 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466512702079 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7918713494 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.052631579 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7894736842 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488517362254 0.236089414692 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184462009727 0.076458572812 241% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.21094770079 0.0737576698707 286% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341958119124 0.150856017488 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182423066066 0.0645574589148 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.