Do you agree or disagree? People nowadays are more willing to help other people (giving food or clothing) than in the past.
No one can deny that people need to each other in the different situations. There are some circumstances that someone can decrease the burden of someone else by giving him a hand, by giving food, money, clothing and so forth. Some people might be inclined toward the opinion that people nowadays are more willing to help other people than in the past. I, nevertheless, am in favor of the idea that people were more enthusiastic to help others in the past. In the following paragraphs, some conspicuous reasons will cogently substantiate my perspective.
The main reason is that these days, the population has been grown increasingly and in proportion with this, demanding of job and work has been increased. The more demands of jobs, the more difficult finding job, and consequently, making money. Needless to say, the competition for getting a lucrative job has made it exclusively possible to people to find an appropriate job which makes them able to afford their own subsistence, not to consider helping other people. According to statistics, the rate of unemployment was highly increased to 42% compared to ten years ago, which it was 15%. As a result, the ability of people to provide a suitable life has decreased significantly. For example, there are plenty of graduated students who are searching a typical job, but they less succeed to find it with regard to terrible economic situation and recession. Thus, it is not possible for them to even think about helping other people by giving them some necessary goods and food.
Another noteworthy point is that nowadays, it is far more difficult to trust people since all of us hear some news about people who swindle other people to get money from them by showing themselves as needy and poor people. They dress in a way which is looked to be miserable persons and attract the other people's compassion and sympathy by asking them money, food or some other kinds of help. For example, a couple of days ago, when I was walking to the university, I saw a man who asked me some money to pay his health expenditure. I trust him because he seems too poor to be able those expenses. Thus, I gave him some amount of money. Afterward, I saw that he went to another person and told him the same things and asked him money for the same reason. I found he was a swindler and I took a negative view after that event.
In conclusion, I have come to believe that people were keener to help other people in the past compared to these days.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 980, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing them some necessary goods and food. Another noteworthy point is that nowaday...
^^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...miserable persons and attract the other peoples compassion and sympathy by asking them ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple in the past compared to these days.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68878718535 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64296016653 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530892448513 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9164898547 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.45 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.85 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348802005245 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108103465279 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127074006124 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250591321926 0.150856017488 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127912579582 0.0645574589148 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.