Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Working on a project with other people is crucial for getting better outcomes. It is thought by some people that students who communicate fwith each other through e-mail will produce better work. However, In my view, it would be better if students would be able to communicate face to face with each other. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explor in following paragraphs.
To begin with, It is essential to work with others and to be surrounded by your colleagues, especially when working for the same project. Students who work in presence of each other tend to be more motivated and enjoy the hours working with their classmates. After they finish their work for the day, they would try to prepare themselves, so they could bring out the best performance the next day of work. My experience as a student is a compelling example of this. About ten years ago, when I was in university, the majority of my classes were group projects. Working with other helped me to develop new skills and at the same time enjoy what I was doing even more than if I were to be working on my own. As a result, that kept me motivated all the time and exited to work with other classmates at the same place. According to this experience, I think that all students would feel more satisfied if they communicate face to face with each other about their project.
Secondly, Students who are together would have the chance to brainstorm and come up with better ideas and solutions for their project. Evidence has shown that students who spend more time in person, working on different group work, they tend to be more productive and effectively contribute to the group. On the other hand, students who communicate via e-mail could miss a lot of details and sometimes misinterpret their thoughts, which might led to delay their work as a group. For instance, in one of my group work that I have participated in high school, one of our group member was sick and did not show up in one of our meeting. he e-mail to us his ideas. It turn out that we all misinterpreted his ideas about the work, that made us to postpone our decision making on solving our problem. Overall, communicating in person would eliminate misunderstanding of thoughts or ideas about the project. If students are in presence of each other, they easily could avoid miscommunication.
To sum up, I strongly believe that communicating face to face is better for the project. This is because by doing so we can enjoy more what we are doing and because we could avoid misunderstanding.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with other people is crucial for getting better outcomes. It is thought by some p...
^^
Line 5, column 635, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... did not show up in one of our meeting. he e-mail to us his ideas. It turn out tha...
^^
Line 5, column 665, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'turns'?
Suggestion: turns
... meeting. he e-mail to us his ideas. It turn out that we all misinterpreted his idea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, i think, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2099.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67483296214 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72266773198 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447661469933 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8245552705 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4090909091 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4090909091 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31818181818 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271399509322 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939083912486 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574674366884 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175813009043 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427950624115 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.