Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by email they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by email, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

By and large, group activities extensively rely on the capability of group members to share their ideas with others and how they communicate their standpoints with them. In fact, the way group members keep track of tasks has a decisive role in fostering a group in a project. In this regard, people adopt different methods to communicate with members of their groups. Some people believe that having meetings in person sounds like a better idea than using emails. I entirely agree with this statement. In what follows, two reasons are discussed elaborately to substantiate my perspective.

Firstly, communicating in person is more beneficial because, in this way, group members can have extensive discussions over the details of the project. Despite that, emails do not provide the opportunity for people involved in the group to share their thoughts about potential problems completely, as the number of words that can be written down in an email is limited. More importantly, through live meeting sessions, all group members can be informed about other's’ opinions conveniently. Moreover, It is important for the group's prosperity that all members share the same information about the project and receive the latest updates. Thus, by attending real-world meetings in person rather than emails, everyone should be present in the meetings at the same time. Consequently, there is no need to send out numerous emails to acknowledge others about changes and project progress. In this way, a considerable amount of time and energy can be saved.

Secondly, direct contact through meeting in person is a profound method for group participants to not only share their thoughts, but also convey their emotions and intuitions with other members. In other words, to achieeive success in a group project, members should openly share their inner-most beliefs and feelings with others with no hesitation. As it is a clear fact, many projects require members to express their feelings toward a certain option. This matter becomes more evidents with those tasks that require members to act upon their creativity. For example, when a group of designers are working on a project, they should discuss their feelings about a certain design or color with others. In this situation, words are not enough to account for how a person feels about one's idea about a detail. Nevertheless, e-mail falls behind in transporting member's perspectives thoroughly.

According to the reasons mentioned above, it can be concluded that having group meetings in person has a prominent role in enabling group members to discuss their viewpoints. In this way, they make better decisions that bring success to the project.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...ntly. Moreover, It is important for the groups prosperity that all members share the s...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 782, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...to account for how a person feels about ones idea about a detail. Nevertheless, e-ma...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in fact, by and large, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2266.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26976744186 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76599141197 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516279069767 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9480755108 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202528959636 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715744297671 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476847982629 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137188669458 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174161061496 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.