Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project

Recently, people have been involved in diverse projects in schools, universities, companies, and ‎other places during their lives. In this regard, some persons believe that members of a project ‎will produce better work if they communicate in person rather than by e-mail, while others ‎hold the opposite supposition, stating that e-mail is better than face-to-face communication in ‎order to accomplish a better project. When it comes to me, I concur with the former group of ‎people. In what follows, I will elaborate on my viewpoint with two specific reasons.‎

First of all, the members of a group can explain their ideas and support them better than by e-‎mail in order to have a preferable project. To be more specific, every person in a group has ‎ideas and thoughts about doing a project, so he or she can fully explain them, and if one of the ‎members does not understand a point, the speaker can support his or her thoughts face to face. ‎On the other hand, when a person receives an e-mail and has a question about it, it is not easy ‎for him or her to e-mail back and asks. In addition, the person who is asked to answer a ‎problem cannot explain enough in writing, like e-mail. As a result, communication by e-mail is ‎not a good way to accomplish a project in an acceptable way.‎

Secondly, communication in person takes less time than using e-mail in order to do better work. ‎To elucidate, when people talk with each other about doing a project, they could finish a ‎significant amount of works in less time. They just should set a meeting and have ‎communication about the progress of the project, which takes less amount of time than by e-‎mail. On the other hand, if classmates or colleagues send e-mail to each other, it takes a long ‎time to do their works because some people do not check their e-mails even in days, so it takes ‎a vast amount of time for individuals to finish their project.‎

In conclusion, with all this taken into account, I firmly believe that when classmates or ‎colleagues talk about a project with each other instead of by e-mail, they will do a better ‎project. Not only can they fully explain and support their ideas and thoughts, but also, they can ‎spend less time communicating about the project.‎

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 391, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accomplishing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'order' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: accomplishing
...an face-to-face communication in ‎order to accomplish a better project. When it comes to me, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 707, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an acceptable way" with adverb for "acceptable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...‎not a good way to accomplish a project in an acceptable way.‎ Secondly, communication in person ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8654822335 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77205351826 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497461928934 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.157330706 48.9658058833 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 159.75 100.406767564 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8333333333 20.6045352989 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.45110844103 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452505124133 0.236089414692 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173414338385 0.076458572812 227% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972455194684 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311071382586 0.150856017488 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680625586831 0.0645574589148 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.