Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Working on projects is the most challenging part of education from both students’ and teachers’ perspective. In fact, teachers expect student learn more by working on projects. But when it comes to the question that do students learn much by working on project as a team or working individually? Students and teachers hold different opinions. On the one hand there are people who believe that working alone allow student to have more self-study, save their time and obtain logical results at the and. On the other there are people who hold conflicting opinion. I come down on the side of working in group and substantiate my statement by following paragraph.
Different ideas expressed by different students will assist student to learn more. In fact, confronting with different problems during project encourage all the members to come up with a remedy to solve the problems and put forth the project. Therefore, students have great opportunity to learn much from their counterparts. For instance, some students may be professional in writing, some may have programming skill or the other one may be a theorist. Consequently, being in a group gives students the chance to learn more regarding these skills in a short time.
Saving time is another benefit of working on projects as a team. As I mentioned earlier, being in a group with students who have their own skills not only cause students to learn much but also it allows student to save their time. In fact, potential problems during working on the projects will be solved sooner since every student will express their own solutions. In fact, they will attack to the project from different perspectives and try their chance. For example, the project may include some parts which needs professional programming language and if there are students who know programming language, the project will not have problems with the project.
Projects will result in more practical results. In fact, working as group decreases the errors may be happened during project since the results will be checked by several person and a particular error may not be neglected by all the members of the group. Moreover, more students mean more novel ideas which may be included in the project, therefore, the results of the project not only become more reliable but also more creative.
To conclude, working as a team on the projects will assist students to learn much from other members and improve their skills. Besides, they may also develop their social and communication skills interacting with their group members.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- Which do you prefer to do?Doing same things or trying new things 76
- Summarise the points made in the lecture,being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Who influence more, family or friends? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun person seems to be countable; consider using: 'several people', 'several persons'.
Suggestion: several people; several persons
...ct since the results will be checked by several person and a particular error may not be negle...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12114014252 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72248197055 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427553444181 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3155053201 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1363636364 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346899161382 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130832314658 0.076458572812 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892421794498 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21820651467 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965323035658 0.0645574589148 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.