I totally agree with the statement that all university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
First, history course is a fundamental course which acts as a foundation of other advanced courses. For example, I took origin of mankind and evolution course in my university second year. To understand human evolution better, I had to explore million years of history of Homo Sapiens and related species. I had to know when first man started to live as a group, when man discovered fire, when man started to cultivate plant and so on. I had to understand each and every aspect of ancient historical changes and find out evolutionary reasons behind them. Even though I was a biology student, understanding evolution required me to learn history and If I had taken a history course then it would have been easier for me. So, learning history is a basic requirement for higher study and history course should be compulsory.
From history we can learn our ancestor’s mistake and avoid repeating them. For example, one of my friend is a nuclear engineer and he is aware of the danger of nuclear weapons by investigating previous history of world war II. He knows how dangerous it can be if the nuclear weapon he is working with is handed to an evil person. In world war II two big cities of Japan, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was completely destroyed by atomic bomb. It took thousands of innocent lives and thousands of people became disabled because of harmful radiation. Knowing the previous history, my friend always stays alert so that nuclear material could not be used to harm mankind. So, learning history is important for a scientist too.
In conclusion, I think history course is a very basic course which should be made mandatory. But It might create overhead for some student so the course content should be kept very elementary level.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 245, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...uman evolution better, I had to explore million years of history of Homo Sapiens and re...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent so the course content should be kept very elementary level.
^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... should be kept very elementary level.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86111111111 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70211598627 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577160493827 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1831452164 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.6470588235 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263976765221 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922068941993 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150060432139 0.0737576698707 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250397246551 0.150856017488 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.234691943153 0.0645574589148 364% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.