Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.

Some people believe that universities or colleges only use for academic purposes for being a good human and glorious career. Personally I believe that not only study but also many factors work behind build-up a good person as well as his/her future success. Social interaction is one of them and everyone should give importance to its financial support as studies.

First of all, being a good student never indicate that a good social being. Some students are extremely introvert at their childhood and when they grow up, they seemingly squeeze themselves under academic pressure. They are busy with a tight schedule like homework, assignment, class project and exam etc. They are not getting enough time to meet or learn social behaviour. For example, in context of my country, parents think that social gathering with friends is unnecessary and totally wastage of time. They all time pressurize their children for reading. As a result, at adulthood, they have a huge lack of knowledge in their manner and conversation with others.

Secondly, we see the totally opposite view in developed country like the United States, Australia where roaming with friends is included as a part of curriculum activities. Where they can learn how to interact with others. In fact, they can learn how to depend on themselves without parenting care. Such things are so much helpful for their future life. Therefore, they grow up as a strong person who survive anywhere and any adverse situation.

Thirdly, Sports are an event where students can get a chance to work together. When they build up a team for their sports competition, they automatically learn how to co-operate others and work simultaneously. Sports are helpful to build up their proper mental health and keep their body fitness. Nowadays many developing cities like Dhaka, Bangladesh losses playing field for over-construction. In reality, there is no space for playing as a result children are more attracted to video game or mobile phone's game. Thus, situation is so worse that they have none percent of interest to go to field to play. It also affects their eyes, brain, mental as well as physical health. It is high time to concern about these issues otherwise we must suffer a lot for future generation. The government should keep a separate budget on it.

In the end, we all are a part of society as social being. So isolating from society, for only concentrating on study never makes someone extra-talented person. If anyone cannot present properly his/her hidden talent in front of audiences, it is going to be valueless. So, each and every child should learn how to interact with others and social behaviour, polite manner, respect the elder person.

Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ded as a part of curriculum activities. Where they can learn how to interact with oth...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, for example, in fact, as a result, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05567928731 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68743657888 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572383073497 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6541562585 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0714285714 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0357142857 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101450398576 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294547971954 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038766095196 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605318086773 0.150856017488 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276648959381 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.