Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today’s world cars play a significant role in humans’ life. Cars are one of the most important facets of transportation in every society, and since the invention of car in about 100 years ago, their usage is increasing in a galloping rate. But, there is a controversy on the future of the cars’ usage so that some are of the opinion that in the coming years automobile industry will not be as prosperous as today, while others believe otherwise. I—for on—subscribe to the first idea on the ground that cars have many disadvantages which will cause to impede utilizing it in the future such as: disruptive traffic jam, air pollution, and speed of movement, to name but a few.
To begin with, by unprecedented rate of growing megacities and also population concentration in these cities, cars’ traffic is a major problem and albeit many solutions that are suggested to this problem but, still there is no any perfect remedy to this social difficulty and annoying traffic jam is increasing more and more in big cities. So it seems that in the future there will be only one way to resolve this challenge and it is the get rid of the cars and use of other transportation vehicles such as subway and monorail.
Secondly, cars are one of the most important elements of air pollution. Although, many governments has been trying to use other source of fuels to reduce this problem but still majority of automobiles are using fossil fuels and they are exacerbating the pollution of the air by emission of more contaminants. Therefore, it can be predicted that other types of transportation vehicles, which can use electricity and other green materials as fuels, will be utilized instead of cars in the future.
Last but not least, developing in society needs more speed. In other words, the more fast transportation is, the higher rate of progressing society experiences. With regard to the first reason that traffic jam reduces the cars’ speed and also regarding the inherent features of cars, the speed of movement is not fast enough with cars and can not meet the future developed societies demands. Therefore it is predictable that there will be a terrible need to fast transportation in next few years and cars will not be able to satisfy this need.
All in all, I do believe that cars can not purvey the increasing demands of societies from transportion vehicles in the future and they should be supplanted by a new vehicle that can be more efficient, less pollutant, and also faster.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 566, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'impeding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: impeding
...ave many disadvantages which will cause to impede utilizing it in the future such as: dis...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ted to this problem but, still there is no any perfect remedy to this social diffi...
^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...the future developed societies demands. Therefore it is predictable that there will be a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, as to, such as, in other words, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90160183066 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89483000185 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489702517162 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.1368117578 48.9658058833 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.8 100.406767564 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1333333333 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24418752251 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996930477478 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110946858286 0.0737576698707 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173743693662 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139264819749 0.0645574589148 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.