Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today
Transportation of people has become more comfortable, faster and more flexible after cars started to be used. Numbers of car users have increased dramatically during the last decades. However, a series of reasons might lead to a reduction of cars in use in twenty years. Some of the most important reasons supporting this claim will be discussed below.
First of all, it is true that the use of cars has made transportation easier and faster than it was in past. Nevertheless, the massive car use has requested the uncontrollable extraction of fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas. The shortage of these fossil fuels, since there are non-renewable, will probably lead to a considerable price increase. Thus, using a car would require spending more money than now and many people would not be able to afford them.
Moreover, stressful conditions that car drivers have to deal with within a day is another reason. People have to wait for a long time in the traffic lights because of traffic jams and they usually struggle to find a free place for parking. These situations cause an additional discomfort and pressure towards human psychology and might lead to aggressive behaviors between individuals due to loss of their self-control.
Additionally, the use of cars causes a remarkable environmental pollution. A worsening air quality, especially in the big cities, affects negatively the public health. The high temperatures during the summer session combined with high pollution rate create a sultry atmosphere. Also, people who have to cope with chronic diseases such as asthma are more vulnerable and suffer due to these conditions.
To sum up, taking into account all things have been spoken above it could be assumed that a decrease of cars in use is possible to happen due to the contribution of a series of factors. Such a decrease would be accompanied by several benefits providing not only healthier atmosphere but also a more balanced and less pressed human psychology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this claim will be discussed below. First of all, it is true that the use of...
^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...portation easier and faster than it was in past. Nevertheless, the massive car use has ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le would not be able to afford them. Moreover, stressful conditions that car ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... due to loss of their self-control. Additionally, the use of cars causes a r...
^^^
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'remarkable environmental pollution'.
Suggestion: remarkable environmental pollution
... Additionally, the use of cars causes a remarkable environmental pollution. A worsening air quality, especially in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and suffer due to these conditions. To sum up, taking into account all thing...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, such as, first of all, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11009174312 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92882394612 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608562691131 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4528937295 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2941176471 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198628896419 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627699871701 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438423945944 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106095943291 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535691488983 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.