Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The world is evolving in technology day by day. With this rapid change in technology and affordability, people tend to make their lives more easier by adopting these technologies. In twenty years, we will be standing at the point where we cannot imagine our lives without technology which has made our lives easier and faster. Car technology is one of them. I believe that in twenty years, there will not be fewer cars rather, many cars with greater technology contained in it. I feel this way for two reasons necessity and affordability, that I will be exploring in this essay.
Some years back, people used to find jobs in the place where they resided or completed their studies. Sometimes, even they use to continue the business or the agricultural activity of their ancestors. Hence, their work place would be very close by such as walk-able distance. They used small vehicles like cycles, motor bikes to commute. Nowadays, due to increase in the job opportunities, due to advancement in technology, people migrate from place to place. They will reside in apartments in metropolitan cities and commute to their work place which will be far. For example, my friend, whose hometown was a small city, moved to a metropolitan city in search of job. He is now staying in an apartment and commutes everyday to his work place which is fifteen kilometers far. For such a far distance it would take more time to reach the work place. In this case it becomes necessary to buy a car for the easy transport.
Another reason to highlight here is the affordability. Today, every member in the family go to work. Hence, there will be not be any dearth for money. This has made the people to increase their comfort by going behind the technologies. It will make them affordable to buy cars and have a easier life for transportation. Not only for the work place, they can also plan for an itinerary. Today cars come with greatest technology conceived in it. Some cars can be monitored without touching the staring wheel and proving instructions to the navigation systems. The brilliant navigation systems take you to the place that you would mention before starting the journey.
With this examples, I feel, in twenty years, there will not be fewer cars, but superfluous of cars with greater technology contained.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...bility, people tend to make their lives more easier by adopting these technologies. In twen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ted their studies. Sometimes, even they use to continue the business or the agricul...
^^^
Line 3, column 717, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ow staying in an apartment and commutes everyday to his work place which is fifteen kilo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ke them affordable to buy cars and have a easier life for transportation. Not onl...
^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the greatest'.
Suggestion: with the greatest
... plan for an itinerary. Today cars come with greatest technology conceived in it. Some cars c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 6, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n before starting the journey. With this examples, I feel, in twenty years, ther...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, for example, i feel, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86294416244 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72558109225 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522842639594 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4151745061 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.6923076923 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1538461538 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.07692307692 5.45110844103 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193962714736 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575439461598 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586574574252 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147499939795 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535252156657 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.