The article says that the option of offering four-day would give more benefits. However, the professor opposes this opinion stating that this option would not affect as the article states, but rather adds more risks. The professor provides three reasons and also provides related explanations for holding such opinions.
First, the reading claims that four-day work week would create more job opportunities. The professor opposes this point by stating the following reason. The four-day work week would not create more job opportunities, rather, it will cost the company more. Because, only for the four day work, the company has to put more effort with the employees, train them well. He also states that if as per the article, if more employees are hired, hiring would cost more and moreover, more office spaces, more computers are needed.
Second, the article says that the four-day work week would offer a reduction in unemployment. But, the professor disapproves this by stating the following opinion and reason. According to the professor, many people would not prefer to work for four days and moreover, if four-day work week is set, the company may raise its expectation level. It may induce more pressure on the employees to complete the work in four days which had to be done in five days. This will not repress the unemployment but rather increases.
Third, the article claims that if four-day work week is offered, the employees would have some private time to pursue their personal interests and spend some relaxed time. The author refutes this by stating his opinion and explanation. The professor states that if such an offer is provided, then more risks are involved. Risks like the employee may loose his interest in work and his or her quality of work may get degrade. Also he might pass the promotion because, the usual act which is observed in managements in corporate, is assessing the work for five days and not four days.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...e involved. Risks like the employee may loose his interest in work and his or her qua...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...or her quality of work may get degrade. Also he might pass the promotion because, th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, third, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 325.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01230769231 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46938365211 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486153846154 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9569400023 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440060692341 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150311498605 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109668098078 0.0662205650399 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295740377902 0.162205337803 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665873820855 0.0443174109184 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.